Connect with us

Business

CFOs raked in a median of $1.45 million in equity compensation last year says Heidrick & Struggles

Published

on


Good morning. Kevin Kelleher here filling in for Sheryl.

Private equity had a banner year in 2021, with deal value at PE firms rising 91% to $1.1 trillion. That heady pace of dealmaking has created intense demand for CFOs that can help right sometimes challenging financials at companies in PE portfolios.

But figuring out what to pay CFOs at PE-backed companies can itself be challenging. Installed CFOs are—along with CEOs and board chairs—instrumental in reshaping companies that PE firms buy. They need to execute on a specific vision, such as shepherding a company’s balance sheet and cash flow according to a new investment thesis. Often, that vision is dictated by the PE investors.

Heidrick & Struggles released this morning its 2022 compensation report for CFOs at PE-backed companies. The executive-search firm surveyed 656 senior financial officers, 56% of which had more than a decade’s worth of experience as CFO with 22% having a decade or more at PE firms under their belt.

The median CFO salary in the survey saw base compensation at $313,000 and bonuses at $125,000. Equity compensation, meanwhile, came in at a median $1.45 million for the 73% of U.S. respondents who received such a package.

“We’re seeing equity compensation is down and cash compensation is up. From a recruiting perspective, companies have needed to adjust to the competitive nature of the market,” Elizabeth Simpson, a partner at Heidrick & Struggles, tells me. “The market has just become much more competitive over over the last couple of years for CFO talent.”

Compensation varied by company revenue, with more pay going to bigger than smaller ones, as well as by industry. Median compensation was highest for the technology sector, followed by energy and business services. Equity compensation, meanwhile, was most generous in consumer companies, followed by tech and financial services, Heidrick found.

PE portfolios may not be as transparent as publicly traded companies, but these companies employ nearly 12 million workers and generate around 7% of U.S. GDP, according to the American Investment Council. After several years of boom times, a slowing economy and rising interest rates are shifting the landscape for the industry. On the one hand, borrowing to finance buyouts could become more costly. On the other, struggling targets in need of a turnaround are likely to become more commonplace.

“The PE deal pipeline continues to be robust, and volatility contributes to that,” Simpson says. “And that volatility can shift the CFO market. Some companies may look to restructure, so the CFOs may need a different skill set.”

In general, a CFO at PE-backed companies will need the standard skill set of any good senior financial executive: leadership skills to mentor and motivate others, a solid finance background, and strong operational and strategic management. Inside PE companies, CFOs may also need to be more hands on, with the agility to translate the fund’s financial goals and ensure smooth communication between the board and employees to make those goals a reality.

While many CFOs working with PE funds have experience inside that industry, “public company training is actually very valuable for these roles,” Simpson says. “The ideal candidate transitioning into a group level CFO role might have had public company experience in a senior leadership role.”

In general, CFOs have not been immune to the effects of the Great Resignation, with 70% of C-suite executives mulling a job transition in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. “There’s already unbelievable competition for CFO talent, and the Great Resignation has added to that,” Simpson says.

That should keep demand for CFOs, at both PE-backed companies and in general, firm for the near future, even if it’s not as overheated as it was in earlier years. “CFO candidates looking for another position still have two or three competing job offers,” Simpson says.


See you tomorrow.

Kevin Kelleher

Big deal

One month into the season for second-quarter earnings, the winners and losers of 2022 are becoming more clear. With 56% of S&P 500 companies reporting results so far, 73% of them saw a positive EPS surprise while 66% disclosed a positive revenue surprise, according to Factset. Guidance is mixed, with Energy and utilities estimating EPS gains of 8.1% and 2.1%, respectively. Communications services are bracing for a 5.5% drop in EPS this year, followed by materials (down 2.6%) and consumer discretionary goods (down 2.1%).

Earnings guidance is higher for energy and utility companies in the S&P 500 but lower for other sectors.

Courtesy of Factset

Going deeper

As inflation continues to hover near a 40-year peak, Microsoft, Walmart, and other companies are giving raises to help retain employees, a Fortune report from Paige McGlauflin and Amber Burton noted. Some HR experts, however, caution leaders to keep a close eye on the already stubborn gender wage gap during this time. The pay gap between men and women in the U.S. was 22.1% last year, according to the Economic Policy Institute. That’s down from 23% in 2020.

Overheard

“The data shows that more environmental and social shareholder proposals were successful at annual meetings at the top-performing companies by total shareholder returns in the 12 months leading up to the vote. Furthermore, average support for environmental and social shareholder proposals was higher at the top-performing companies.”

Governance company Diligent, which found that ESG proposals at corporate shareholder meetings are on the rise—although the vast majority of votes are still against them. Only around 1 in 4 proposals are getting “yes” votes, Diligence said in research prepared for Fortune

This is the web version of CFO Daily, a newsletter on the trends and individuals shaping corporate finance. Sign up to get it delivered free to your inbox.

Business

Coinbase’s near-term outlook is ‘still grim’, JPMorgan says, while BofA is more positive about firm’s ability to face crypto winter

Published

on

Coinbase's near-term outlook is 'still grim', JPMorgan says, while BofA is more positive about firm's ability to face crypto winter

Coinbase is well positioned to successfully navigate this crypto winter and take market share, Bank of America said in a research report Tuesday. It maintained its buy recommendation following the exchange’s second-quarter results.

The results warrant “a muted stock reaction,” the report said. Net revenue of $803 million was below the bank’s and consensus estimates, while its adjusted $151 million loss before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization was better than the street expected. Importantly, the company remains “cautiously optimistic” it can reach its goal of no more than $500 million of adjusted EBITDA loss for the full year, the report added.

Coinbase shares fell almost 8% in premarket trading to $80.74.

Bank of America notes that Coinbase had no counterparty exposure to the crypto insolvencies witnessed in the second quarter. The company also has a “history of no credit losses from financing activities, holds customer assets 1:1, and any lending activity of customer crypto is at the discretion of the customer, with 100%+ collateral required.” These rigorous risk-management practices will be a “positive long-term differentiator” for the stock, the bank said.

JPMorgan said Coinbase had endured another challenging quarter, while noting some positives.

Trading volume and revenue were down materially. Subscription revenue was also lower, but would have been much worse were it not for higher interest rates, it said in a research report Wednesday.

The company is taking steps on expense management, and in addition to the June headcount reductions, is scaling back marketing and pausing some product investments, the note said.

The bank says the company’s near-term outlook is “still grim,” noting that the exchange expects a continued decline in 3Q 2022 monthly transacting users (MTUs) and trading volumes, but says Coinbase could take more “cost actions” if crypto prices fall further.

JPMorgan is less optimistic than Bank of America about the company in the near term, saying pressure on revenue from falling crypto markets will have a negative impact on the stock price. Still, it sees positives including higher interest rates, from which the firm will generate revenue. It also sees opportunities for the exchange to grow its user base, leveraging almost $6 billion of cash. The surge in crypto prices in July, and the forthcoming Ethereum Merge are also seen as positive catalysts, it added.

The bank maintained its neutral rating on the stock and raised its price target to $64 from $61.

Sign up for the Fortune Features email list so you don’t miss our biggest features, exclusive interviews, and investigations.

Continue Reading

Business

Elon Musk sold $6.9B in Tesla stock in case he’s forced to buy Twitter

Published

on

Elon Musk sold $6.9B in Tesla stock in case he's forced to buy Twitter

Elon Musk sold $6.9 billion of his shares in Tesla Inc., the billionaire’s biggest sale on record, saying he needed cash in case he is forced to go ahead with his aborted deal to buy Twitter Inc.

“In the (hopefully unlikely) event that Twitter forces this deal to close *and* some equity partners don’t come through, it is important to avoid an emergency sale of Tesla stock,” Musk tweeted late Tuesday after the sales were disclosed in a series of regulatory filings. 

Asked by followers if he was done selling and would buy Tesla stock again if the $44 billion deal doesn’t close, Musk responded: “Yes.”

Tesla’s chief executive officer offloaded about 7.92 million shares on Aug. 5, according to the new filings. The sale comes just four months after the world’s richest person said he had no further plans to sell Tesla shares after disposing of $8.5 billion of stock in the wake of his initial offer to buy Twitter.  

Musk last month said he was terminating the agreement to buy the social network where he has more than 102 million followers and take it private, claiming the company has made “misleading representations” over the number of spam bots on the service. Twitter has since sued to force Musk to consummate the deal, and a trial in the Delaware Chancery Court has been set for October. 

In May, Musk dropped plans to partially fund the purchase with a margin loan tied to his Tesla stake and increased the size of the equity component of the deal to $33.5 billion. He had previously announced that he secured $7.1 billion of equity commitments from investors including billionaire Larry Ellison, Sequoia Capital, and Binance. 

“I’ll put the odds at 75% that he’s buying Twitter. I’m shocked,” said Gene Munster, a former technology analyst who’s now a managing partner at venture-capital firm Loup Ventures. “This is going to be a headwind for Tesla in the near term. In the long term, all that matters is deliveries and gross margin.”

At the weekend, Musk tweeted that if Twitter provided its method of sampling accounts to determine the number of bots and how they are confirmed to be real, “the deal should proceed on original terms.” 

Musk, 51, has now sold around $32 billion worth of stock in Tesla over the past 10 months. The disposals started in November after Musk, a prolific Twitter user, polled users of the platform on whether he should trim his stake. The purpose of the latest sales wasn’t immediately clear.  

Tesla shares have risen about 35% from recent lows reached in May, though are still down about 20% this year. 

With a $250.2 billion fortune, Musk is the world’s richest person, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index, but his wealth has fallen around $20 billion this year as Tesla shares declined.    

Sign up for the Fortune Features email list so you don’t miss our biggest features, exclusive interviews, and investigations.



Continue Reading

Business

The rent is too d*mn high for Gen Z: Younger generations are ‘squeezed the most’ by higher rents, BofA says

Published

on

The rent is too d*mn high for Gen Z: Younger generations are 'squeezed the most' by higher rents, BofA says

Most of Gen Z is too young to remember the 2010 New York gubernatorial candidate Jimmy McMillan.

But over a decade later, they would probably agree with his signature issue (and catchphrase): the rent is too damn high.

This July, median rent payments were 7.4% higher than during the same period last year, according to a Bank of America report released Tuesday. 

The national median price for a one-bedroom apartment has been hitting new highs nearly every month this summer. It was $1,450 for July, according to rental platform Zumper. In the country’s largest city, New York, average rent exceeded a shocking $5,000 a month for the first time ever in June. 

But inflation in the rental market hasn’t hit each generation equally, and no one is getting squeezed harder by the higher monthly payments as Gen Z. Those born after 1996 have seen their median rent payment go up 16% since last July, compared to just a 3% increase for Baby Boomers, BofA internal data shows. 
“Younger consumers are getting squeezed the most by higher rent inflation,” BofA wrote.

The great rent comeback

Early in the pandemic, landlords slashed rents and gave significant COVID discounts to entice tenants to stay instead of leaving urban areas. Once those deals started expiring in 2021, many landlords suddenly raised payments once again, sometimes asking for over double their pandemic value. 

Young people across the board have been hit hard, and rent burdens compared to age can be seen even within a single generation. Younger millennials had their median rent payment grow 11% from last year, while the median payment for older millennials rose 7%. Gen X experienced a 5% median rent increase, according to BofA. 

It’s not a surprise, then, that Gen Z feels so strapped for cash. The majority of young people, 61%, said they want to receive their wages daily instead of twice a week, a practice typically reserved for workers living paycheck to paycheck, according to a report from the Center for Generational Kinetics, which specializes in research across the generations. Rising rent inflation has even priced nearly a third of Gen Zers out of the apartment search altogether. Around 29% of them have resorted to living at home as a “long-term housing solution,” according to a June survey from personal finance company Credit Karma.

It’s no wonder—the rent really is too high.

Sign up for the Fortune Features email list so you don’t miss our biggest features, exclusive interviews, and investigations.

Continue Reading

Copyright © 2021 Seminole Press.