Connect with us

Politics

CMS Architecture: Difference Between Headless CMS and Decoupled CMS

Published

on

CMS Architecture: Difference Between Headless CMS and Decoupled CMS


Are you familiar with all the buzzing going around different content management solutions? 

There’s a high chance that you will be confused by buzzwords associated with content management solutions if you’re starting with digital transformation.  

With so many new CMS alternatives emerging in the market, you can leave scratching your head wondering, “Aren’t these all the same?” It seems to have a Tower of Babel-like aspect. Even though we all talk in different languages, we all attempt to convey the same message. 

Therefore, it’s crucial to consider what would work for your digital project while planning your next CMS move. Your foremost step should be to have a better understanding of these terminologies.  

As a result, in this article, I’ll be walking you through the definitions, differences, benefits, and also drawbacks of a headless CMS and decoupled CMS. 

OH, and don’t worry if you’re unfamiliar with these terminologies; I’ll explain them all eventually. 

What is Headless CMS? 

Depending on the device, channels, and brands today require a headless system that enables them to use numerous heads or front-end delivery systems that serve the end user. 

In a traditional CMS architecture, the front end is represented by the head, and the body represents the back end. However, the front end in headless CMS is eliminated, leaving behind the back end. The back end serves as a content repository in this situation. Consequently, even though the content can be written, saved, and sent using a headless CMS, it still needs to be presented independently. Moreover, because a closely linked front-end presentation layer does not manage the back-end, content can now be pushed anywhere.

Additionally, there are several other ways that developers might handle the presentation layer while working with a headless CMS. For example, developers can choose from dynamic JS frameworks like Angular to static site generators like Gridsom, Nextjs, TezJS, or Gatsby, based on how they feel the web project should function. 

So, how does headless CMS for web development appear to developers? First, it enables your developers to swiftly create front-end user interfaces and write code in any language they choose. 

Advantages of Headless CMS 

Let’s now discuss the advantages of utilizing headless CMS for web development.

  1. Omnichannel Experience – You can efficiently distribute the content across different platforms or systems from a single back-end. 
  2. Flexible in Nature – Developers and marketers can choose technologies for making distinctive user experiences because there are no in-built templates.
  3. Scalability – You can upgrade and customize your digital information without compromising the system’s overall performance because the front-end and back-end are separated.
  4. Time-Efficient – The same content can be quickly distributed to many different touchpoints, and changes can be made without incurring additional costs. 
  5. Effortless Revamping – Making certain adjustments does not necessitate a complete system redesign. 

 What Might Keep Users Away from Headless CMS? 

Let’s now walk through the drawbacks coming with headless CMS-  

  1. Developer Dependency – Marketers will need to collaborate closely with the developers to visualize how their content will appear in the channels it is being sent to because they lack the visual tools necessary for generating page layouts on their own. 
  2. No Content Previews – The ability to easily preview the content before it goes live is unavailable. You must make use of third-party tools to get around this. 
  3. No Outlined Presentation Layer – You will require many technologies to act as the head if there are no pre-made templates or themes. 

What is a Decoupled CMS? 

The separation of the front-end and back-end is what makes a CMS decoupled. A decoupled CMS separates back-end and front-end activities, unlike traditional CMSs that frequently combine both. As a result, the strategies for developing and delivering content are independent of one another.  

A decoupled CMS also makes no assumptions about your project. Instead, it provides templates and development tools to help you create what you seek. 

The decoupled CMS has a head, unlike a headless CMS; however, using it is optional. Simply put, a decoupled CMS can carry out all the same operations as headless CMS while considering the presentation layer. 

Decoupled CMS is becoming a popular choice among businesses because they offer the flexibility of a distinct front-end and back-end, but they also require publishing support. In addition, these CMSs make the future-proofing website more effortless. You can entirely revamp the website without changing how the CMS is implemented. 

Advantages of Decoupled CMS 

Let’s now discuss the advantages of utilizing decoupled CMS for web development- 

  1. Future-Proof – It is more adaptable in the wake of modifications on the user interface side.
  2. Rapid Nature – The content distribution is quicker, more flexible, and more versatile than with a standard CMS.
  3. Faster-to-Market – A new architecture can be operational more quickly thanks to simpler deployment. 
  4. Partner Apps and Collaborations – Integrations with third-party are simpler and less disruptive. 
  5. Less Reliable – Compared to headless, it has minimal developer and publisher dependencies. 

What Might Keep Users Away from Decouple CMS? 

Let’s now look at the drawbacks coming with decoupled CMS. 

  1. Escalating Costs – Incorporating third-party apps and integrations increase the standard costs of your platforms and are also prone to management errors.
  2. Enhanced User Requirements – A deeper understanding of the system is required by content creators to carry out content strategies because it is more complex than a traditional CMS. 
  3. Need for Technical Competence – Compared to the headless system, decoupled CMS requires more development work, particularly when creating the front end. 

Understanding the Difference Between Headless CMS and Decoupled CMS 

You must be wondering, ‘How headless CMS and Decoupled CMS is different from each other?’  

So, welcome to the core part of our article; here, I’ll tread you across the significant difference between headless CMS and decoupled CMS; this will provide you with a better idea of which to choose when starting your next web development project. 

Start by considering decoupled CMS as proactive and headless CMS as reactive to comprehend their architecture differences better. 

Decoupled architecture actively delivers and presents formatted content to multiple channels once the content has been prepared in the background. 

On the other hand, headless CMS lacks the functionality to deliver content to the end-user on its own and is a content-only data source. Although content is created and maintained, it merely stays there, waiting for an API to request and provide it to systems and applications. 

Conclusion!! 

The only way to adopt the IoT era that we are all being dragged into by huge conglomerates like Google, Apple, and Amazon is through content management systems (CMS), whether opting for a headless CMS or decoupled CMS. 

However, you must think: Is switching to a headless CMS or decoupled CMS architecture the best course of action for your company? 

So, to be honest, this decision totally depends on the needs and requirements of your organization. However, from the information like description, benefits, and limitations mentioned in the article above, you can seamlessly evaluate which architecture will work and perform effectively for your organization and your business goals. 

Therefore, as I draw to a close, let me express my gratitude for your time and patience.  

Pratik Mistry

I am Pratik Mistry, a rare mix of technologist and vice president in sales at Radixweb. My passion lies is in helping companies to grow revenues by delivering top notch custom software development solutions and build value-based partnerships. When not driving high-impact go to market strategies, I love to try new cuisines and going to the movies.

Politics

Fintech Kennek raises $12.5M seed round to digitize lending

Published

on

Google eyed for $2 billion Anthropic deal after major Amazon play


London-based fintech startup Kennek has raised $12.5 million in seed funding to expand its lending operating system.

According to an Oct. 10 tech.eu report, the round was led by HV Capital and included participation from Dutch Founders Fund, AlbionVC, FFVC, Plug & Play Ventures, and Syndicate One. Kennek offers software-as-a-service tools to help non-bank lenders streamline their operations using open banking, open finance, and payments.

The platform aims to automate time-consuming manual tasks and consolidate fragmented data to simplify lending. Xavier De Pauw, founder of Kennek said:

“Until kennek, lenders had to devote countless hours to menial operational tasks and deal with jumbled and hard-coded data – which makes every other part of lending a headache. As former lenders ourselves, we lived and breathed these frustrations, and built kennek to make them a thing of the past.”

The company said the latest funding round was oversubscribed and closed quickly despite the challenging fundraising environment. The new capital will be used to expand Kennek’s engineering team and strengthen its market position in the UK while exploring expansion into other European markets. Barbod Namini, Partner at lead investor HV Capital, commented on the investment:

“Kennek has developed an ambitious and genuinely unique proposition which we think can be the foundation of the entire alternative lending space. […] It is a complicated market and a solution that brings together all information and stakeholders onto a single platform is highly compelling for both lenders & the ecosystem as a whole.”

The fintech lending space has grown rapidly in recent years, but many lenders still rely on legacy systems and manual processes that limit efficiency and scalability. Kennek aims to leverage open banking and data integration to provide lenders with a more streamlined, automated lending experience.

The seed funding will allow the London-based startup to continue developing its platform and expanding its team to meet demand from non-bank lenders looking to digitize operations. Kennek’s focus on the UK and Europe also comes amid rising adoption of open banking and open finance in the regions.

Featured Image Credit: Photo from Kennek.io; Thank you!

Radek Zielinski

Radek Zielinski is an experienced technology and financial journalist with a passion for cybersecurity and futurology.

Continue Reading

Politics

Fortune 500’s race for generative AI breakthroughs

Published

on

Deanna Ritchie


As excitement around generative AI grows, Fortune 500 companies, including Goldman Sachs, are carefully examining the possible applications of this technology. A recent survey of U.S. executives indicated that 60% believe generative AI will substantially impact their businesses in the long term. However, they anticipate a one to two-year timeframe before implementing their initial solutions. This optimism stems from the potential of generative AI to revolutionize various aspects of businesses, from enhancing customer experiences to optimizing internal processes. In the short term, companies will likely focus on pilot projects and experimentation, gradually integrating generative AI into their operations as they witness its positive influence on efficiency and profitability.

Goldman Sachs’ Cautious Approach to Implementing Generative AI

In a recent interview, Goldman Sachs CIO Marco Argenti revealed that the firm has not yet implemented any generative AI use cases. Instead, the company focuses on experimentation and setting high standards before adopting the technology. Argenti recognized the desire for outcomes in areas like developer and operational efficiency but emphasized ensuring precision before putting experimental AI use cases into production.

According to Argenti, striking the right balance between driving innovation and maintaining accuracy is crucial for successfully integrating generative AI within the firm. Goldman Sachs intends to continue exploring this emerging technology’s potential benefits and applications while diligently assessing risks to ensure it meets the company’s stringent quality standards.

One possible application for Goldman Sachs is in software development, where the company has observed a 20-40% productivity increase during its trials. The goal is for 1,000 developers to utilize generative AI tools by year’s end. However, Argenti emphasized that a well-defined expectation of return on investment is necessary before fully integrating generative AI into production.

To achieve this, the company plans to implement a systematic and strategic approach to adopting generative AI, ensuring that it complements and enhances the skills of its developers. Additionally, Goldman Sachs intends to evaluate the long-term impact of generative AI on their software development processes and the overall quality of the applications being developed.

Goldman Sachs’ approach to AI implementation goes beyond merely executing models. The firm has created a platform encompassing technical, legal, and compliance assessments to filter out improper content and keep track of all interactions. This comprehensive system ensures seamless integration of artificial intelligence in operations while adhering to regulatory standards and maintaining client confidentiality. Moreover, the platform continuously improves and adapts its algorithms, allowing Goldman Sachs to stay at the forefront of technology and offer its clients the most efficient and secure services.

Featured Image Credit: Photo by Google DeepMind; Pexels; Thank you!

Deanna Ritchie

Managing Editor at ReadWrite

Deanna is the Managing Editor at ReadWrite. Previously she worked as the Editor in Chief for Startup Grind and has over 20+ years of experience in content management and content development.

Continue Reading

Politics

UK seizes web3 opportunity simplifying crypto regulations

Published

on

Deanna Ritchie


As Web3 companies increasingly consider leaving the United States due to regulatory ambiguity, the United Kingdom must simplify its cryptocurrency regulations to attract these businesses. The conservative think tank Policy Exchange recently released a report detailing ten suggestions for improving Web3 regulation in the country. Among the recommendations are reducing liability for token holders in decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) and encouraging the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) to adopt alternative Know Your Customer (KYC) methodologies, such as digital identities and blockchain analytics tools. These suggestions aim to position the UK as a hub for Web3 innovation and attract blockchain-based businesses looking for a more conducive regulatory environment.

Streamlining Cryptocurrency Regulations for Innovation

To make it easier for emerging Web3 companies to navigate existing legal frameworks and contribute to the UK’s digital economy growth, the government must streamline cryptocurrency regulations and adopt forward-looking approaches. By making the regulatory landscape clear and straightforward, the UK can create an environment that fosters innovation, growth, and competitiveness in the global fintech industry.

The Policy Exchange report also recommends not weakening self-hosted wallets or treating proof-of-stake (PoS) services as financial services. This approach aims to protect the fundamental principles of decentralization and user autonomy while strongly emphasizing security and regulatory compliance. By doing so, the UK can nurture an environment that encourages innovation and the continued growth of blockchain technology.

Despite recent strict measures by UK authorities, such as His Majesty’s Treasury and the FCA, toward the digital assets sector, the proposed changes in the Policy Exchange report strive to make the UK a more attractive location for Web3 enterprises. By adopting these suggestions, the UK can demonstrate its commitment to fostering innovation in the rapidly evolving blockchain and cryptocurrency industries while ensuring a robust and transparent regulatory environment.

The ongoing uncertainty surrounding cryptocurrency regulations in various countries has prompted Web3 companies to explore alternative jurisdictions with more precise legal frameworks. As the United States grapples with regulatory ambiguity, the United Kingdom can position itself as a hub for Web3 innovation by simplifying and streamlining its cryptocurrency regulations.

Featured Image Credit: Photo by Jonathan Borba; Pexels; Thank you!

Deanna Ritchie

Managing Editor at ReadWrite

Deanna is the Managing Editor at ReadWrite. Previously she worked as the Editor in Chief for Startup Grind and has over 20+ years of experience in content management and content development.

Continue Reading

Copyright © 2021 Seminole Press.