Connect with us

Politics

Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Security: Challenges and Solutions

Published

on

Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Security: Challenges and Solutions


If we define cryptocurrency, it is a digital asset used for performing transitions digitally. Strong cryptography is employed in it to safeguard financial transactions, restrict the creation of new units, and confirm the transfer of assets.

Furthermore, the underlying technology that powers cryptocurrency is blockchain. What’s that? Well, Blockchain is a distributed digital ledger that stores transactional records across a network of computers, providing an unchangeable and secure platform.

In essence, it offers an incorruptible way to document and monitor any type of transaction. It does not need a central authority or intermediary.

Consequently, each transaction is verified and recorded by a network of users and, once recorded, cannot be altered or deleted.

Nevertheless, in spite of the myriad advantages associated with cryptocurrencies and blockchain technology, what are the significant security challenges that necessitate attention? Let’s have that discussion into some of the potential cryptocurrency and blockchain security challenges and their corresponding solutions.

But digging into that, we must understand more about blockchain and cryptocurrency.

Blockchain Technology Explained- How Does It Work?

The term “blockchain” originated from its unique method of holding transaction records, with each block linked together to form an unbreachable chain. As the number of transactions increases, the blockchain dynamically expands alongside it.

Each block in this robust system actively records and confirms the precise time and sequence of transactions, all carefully logged within the blockchain.

These operations occur within an exclusive network governed by rules collectively agreed upon by the participating members.

Furthermore, within each block, you see a distinct digital fingerprint or unique identifier known as a hash. Hash plays a pivotal role in maintaining the integrity of the blockchain.

 

Plus, timestamped batches of recent valid transactions are actively included within the block alongside the crucial hash of the previous block.

The inclusion of the previous block’s hash serves a vital purpose by actively connecting the blocks together, ensuring that no modifications can be made to any block or the insertion of a new block between existing ones.

This method, in theory, establishes an impenetrable barrier, rendering the blockchain impervious to tampering.

Types of Blockchain

1. Public Blockchain

Public blockchain operates as a permissionless distributed ledger, actively welcoming and allowing anyone to join and engage in transactions.

These blockchains facilitate equal rights for all nodes, enabling them to access the blockchain, generate new blocks of data, and validate existing blocks.

The public blockchains primarily serve as platforms for cryptocurrency exchange and mining. Some of the real-time examples of the public blockchain are:

  • Bitcoin
  • Ethereum
  • Bitcoin Cash
  • Litecoin
  • Monero
  • IOTA

2. Private Blockchain

Private blockchains, alternatively known as managed blockchains, incorporate permissioned networks under the control of a single organization.

Within this structure, the central authority determines which entities can participate as nodes within the private blockchain.

Furthermore, the central authority can allocate varying degrees of functionality and rights to different nodes within the network.

Unlike public blockchains, which emphasize inclusivity and transparency, private blockchains are tailor-made to satisfy the requirements and specifications of a specific network or organization.

Some examples of private blockchains are:

  • Ethereum Enterprise
  • Hyperledger
  • Ripple
  • R3 Corda

3. Consortium Blockchain

Consortium blockchains aim to strike a balance by allowing a select group of trusted entities to participate in the validation process, enhancing efficiency while maintaining a degree of decentralization.

4. Hybrid Blockchain

On the other hand, hybrid blockchains combine elements of both private and public blockchains, tailoring the network structure best to suit the specific requirements and objectives of the participants.

These advancements in blockchain technology offer alternative approaches to overcome the limitations associated with private and public blockchains.

5 Cryptocurrency And Blockchain Security Issues And Solutions

Cryptocurrency and blockchain technology have ushered in a revolutionary era of digital transactions, yet the soaring prevalence of these transactions has concurrently amplified security concerns.

Here are 5 of the blockchain security challenges and their solutions.

1. 51% Attack

One of the cryptocurrency and blockchain challenges is a “51% Attack.” With a majority attack, sometimes called a 51% attack, an entity can take control of more than half of a blockchain’s computational power. This dominance is typically achieved by renting mining hash power from a third party.

Upon successfully executing a 51% attack, the perpetrators acquire the ability to alter the confirmation of new transactions and manipulate the order in which these transactions are processed.

Hackers can rewrite segments of the blockchain, including reversing their own transactions, thus creating a phenomenon known as double-spending.

Furthermore, a 51% attack is one of the most dreaded threats in the realm of blockchain. Usually, at its outset, a blockchain is especially vulnerable to attacks.

Also, one remarkable thing is that it does not applicable to enterprise or private blockchains, which possess different mechanisms and security measures to safeguard against such risks.

In recent years, 51% attacks have emerged, causing significant disruptions in the cryptocurrency landscape.

  • One such incident occurred in August 2021 when Bitcoin SV (BSV) experienced a decline of approximately 5% in value following an attack.
  • Bitcoin Gold (BTG), another fork of Bitcoin, also fell victim to a 51% attack in 2019.

Solutions to the problem of a 51% Attack:

  • Implementing Proof-of-Stake (PoS) consensus reduces 51% of attack risks by relying on token ownership instead of computational power. This economically deters attackers from controlling network resources.
  • Preventing 51% of attacks involves increasing the network’s hash rate. This decentralizes the network, making it difficult for any individual or group to gain control.
  • Effective governance and attentive monitoring ensure blockchain security. Regular audits, bug bounties, and community involvement build trust and support network growth.

2. Phishing Attacks

Phishing is a widespread cyberattack that targets individuals and has also extended into the cryptocurrency domain. In attacks, scammers pose as trustworthy entities to trick victims into revealing sensitive information, like their wallet’s private key.

By doing so, they can access the victim’s digital assets and steal them. Usually, scammers try to contact cryptocurrency holders through SMS, phone calls, and emails. There is a fake link to a reputable company in the mail.

When a victim clicks the link and enters their private key or other information, it is sent straight to the scammers.

Through crypto phishing, scammers easily breach crypto wallets and effortlessly transfer funds to different addresses.

Almost twice as much crypto was stolen in 2021 as in 2020, when scammers stole $14 billion. Some standard crypto and blockchain phishing scams that have surfaced recently are:

  • Malicious AirDrops
  • Seed Phrase Phishing
  • Ice Phishing
  • Clone Phishing Attack

Solutions to the problem of phishing attacks:

  • To strengthen device security, install a dependable anti-virus program as well as malicious link detection software.
  • To boost browser security, add a verified extension to alert you about dangerous sites.
  • Prior to clicking any links, be sure to scrutinize them. If you receive an email asking for login information in relation to the matter, be sure to check with the partner.
  • Instead of clicking the link, manually enter the address in your browser.
  • Ensure your system and programs are up to date.

3. Blockchain Endpoint Vulnerabilities

The vulnerability of blockchain endpoints represents an ongoing security challenge within the blockchain ecosystem.

The endpoint of a blockchain network refers to the point at which users directly engage with the blockchain using electronic devices, i.e. mobile phones, tablets, and computers.

Hackers can closely monitor user behavior, seeking opportunities to target these devices to steal the user’s key. By gaining unauthorized access to the key, they can compromise the user’s security and potentially gain control over their blockchain assets or sensitive information.

This particular blockchain security challenge highlights the importance of implementing robust measures to protect blockchain endpoints.

Solutions to the problem of blockchain endpoint vulnerabilities:

  • Implement robust authentication methods, encryption protocols, and regular security updates to mitigate the risk of endpoint vulnerabilities.
  • Install reputable antivirus software on your electronic devices.
  • Avoid storing blockchain keys as text files on your computer or mobile phone.
  • Regularly review your system, monitoring time, location, and device access.
  • By adopting stringent security practices, blockchain users can enhance the overall security posture of the ecosystem and minimize the potential for unauthorized access and data breaches.

4. Sybil Attacks

The Sybil attack represents a sophisticated strategy adversaries employ to manipulate blockchain networks. This attack is orchestrated by assigning multiple identifiers to a single node, taking advantage of the decentralized nature of blockchain networks where trust is not centralized, and requests are distributed among various nodes.

During a Sybil attack, a hacker gains control over numerous nodes within the network. These malicious nodes form a virtual barrier around the victim, surrounding them with fraudulent nodes that collude to intercept and manipulate their transactions. Consequently, the victim becomes vulnerable to double-spending attacks, undermining the integrity of the blockchain.

In the space of peer-to-peer networks, one notable instance of a Sybil attack occurred in 2014 against the Tor network. Tor, a decentralized network facilitating private conversations, fell victim to this attack.

A similar, but potentially more damaging, Sybil attack targeted Bitcoin holders utilizing the Tor network in 2020. The hackers behind this attack specifically targeted individuals conducting Bitcoin transactions through Tor.

Solutions to the problem of Sybil Attacks:

  • One approach is to increase the cost associated with creating new identities, making it economically unfeasible for attackers to amass a significant number of fake nodes.
  • Another strategy involves implementing trust-based mechanisms for joining the network, requiring some form of authentication or verification before allowing participation.

5. Routing attacks

Routing attacks present a substantial security and privacy risk within the realm of blockchain technology, necessitating increased vigilance and proactive measures.

The seamless functioning of blockchain technology heavily relies on resilient network infrastructure. However, vulnerabilities inherent in the Border Gateway Protocol (BGP), the routing protocol employed by internet service providers (ISPs) to exchange route information, can be exploited by malicious actors.

Security issues associated with routing in blockchain networks can yield severe consequences. An illustrative example is the 2014 incident wherein a hacker successfully executed a routing attack, impeding the propagation of mined blocks across the network.

By deceitfully claiming ownership of the work conducted by legitimate miners, the attacker wrongfully acquired mining fees, compromising the fairness and integrity of the blockchain ecosystem.

Solutions to the problem of routing attacks:

  • Enhancing the security and resilience of the underlying network infrastructure, ensuring that ISPs employ secure routing protocols and diligently address vulnerabilities in the BGP.
  • Blockchain networks should implement mechanisms to detect and mitigate routing attacks, such as monitoring for anomalies and unauthorized route changes.

Winding Up!

As the value of your blockchain increases in the marketplace, it becomes more susceptible to attacks. This blog has provided insights into some of the common cryptocurrency and blockchain challenges and solutions to overcome them.

Blockchain is considered a groundbreaking technology that combines robust coding practices with consensus-building processes. The security of a blockchain relies on the underlying programming.

When building a blockchain, it is crucial to ensure that all possible loopholes are identified and effectively blocked.

Hire a team of highly experienced blockchain developers who specialize in ensuring the security of blockchain systems.

Experienced professionals are adept at mitigating the security issues associated with blockchain technology.

However, while the services of a blockchain development company may seem costly, it will be worth the investment.

Featured Image Credit: Graphic provided by the Author; Thank you!

Mahabir Dash

Mahabir leads a team of  software architects and seasoned software engineers skilled in Web 3.0 & Mobility solutions at ScalaCode. He enjoys solving critical business problems with be-scope and scalable software solutions that are viable and easy to use. From designing Web 2.0 apps back in 2005 to building decentralised and distributed complex systems now, he has led his teams to deliver performance-rich solutions to customers worldwide.

Politics

Fintech Kennek raises $12.5M seed round to digitize lending

Published

on

Google eyed for $2 billion Anthropic deal after major Amazon play


London-based fintech startup Kennek has raised $12.5 million in seed funding to expand its lending operating system.

According to an Oct. 10 tech.eu report, the round was led by HV Capital and included participation from Dutch Founders Fund, AlbionVC, FFVC, Plug & Play Ventures, and Syndicate One. Kennek offers software-as-a-service tools to help non-bank lenders streamline their operations using open banking, open finance, and payments.

The platform aims to automate time-consuming manual tasks and consolidate fragmented data to simplify lending. Xavier De Pauw, founder of Kennek said:

“Until kennek, lenders had to devote countless hours to menial operational tasks and deal with jumbled and hard-coded data – which makes every other part of lending a headache. As former lenders ourselves, we lived and breathed these frustrations, and built kennek to make them a thing of the past.”

The company said the latest funding round was oversubscribed and closed quickly despite the challenging fundraising environment. The new capital will be used to expand Kennek’s engineering team and strengthen its market position in the UK while exploring expansion into other European markets. Barbod Namini, Partner at lead investor HV Capital, commented on the investment:

“Kennek has developed an ambitious and genuinely unique proposition which we think can be the foundation of the entire alternative lending space. […] It is a complicated market and a solution that brings together all information and stakeholders onto a single platform is highly compelling for both lenders & the ecosystem as a whole.”

The fintech lending space has grown rapidly in recent years, but many lenders still rely on legacy systems and manual processes that limit efficiency and scalability. Kennek aims to leverage open banking and data integration to provide lenders with a more streamlined, automated lending experience.

The seed funding will allow the London-based startup to continue developing its platform and expanding its team to meet demand from non-bank lenders looking to digitize operations. Kennek’s focus on the UK and Europe also comes amid rising adoption of open banking and open finance in the regions.

Featured Image Credit: Photo from Kennek.io; Thank you!

Radek Zielinski

Radek Zielinski is an experienced technology and financial journalist with a passion for cybersecurity and futurology.

Continue Reading

Politics

Fortune 500’s race for generative AI breakthroughs

Published

on

Deanna Ritchie


As excitement around generative AI grows, Fortune 500 companies, including Goldman Sachs, are carefully examining the possible applications of this technology. A recent survey of U.S. executives indicated that 60% believe generative AI will substantially impact their businesses in the long term. However, they anticipate a one to two-year timeframe before implementing their initial solutions. This optimism stems from the potential of generative AI to revolutionize various aspects of businesses, from enhancing customer experiences to optimizing internal processes. In the short term, companies will likely focus on pilot projects and experimentation, gradually integrating generative AI into their operations as they witness its positive influence on efficiency and profitability.

Goldman Sachs’ Cautious Approach to Implementing Generative AI

In a recent interview, Goldman Sachs CIO Marco Argenti revealed that the firm has not yet implemented any generative AI use cases. Instead, the company focuses on experimentation and setting high standards before adopting the technology. Argenti recognized the desire for outcomes in areas like developer and operational efficiency but emphasized ensuring precision before putting experimental AI use cases into production.

According to Argenti, striking the right balance between driving innovation and maintaining accuracy is crucial for successfully integrating generative AI within the firm. Goldman Sachs intends to continue exploring this emerging technology’s potential benefits and applications while diligently assessing risks to ensure it meets the company’s stringent quality standards.

One possible application for Goldman Sachs is in software development, where the company has observed a 20-40% productivity increase during its trials. The goal is for 1,000 developers to utilize generative AI tools by year’s end. However, Argenti emphasized that a well-defined expectation of return on investment is necessary before fully integrating generative AI into production.

To achieve this, the company plans to implement a systematic and strategic approach to adopting generative AI, ensuring that it complements and enhances the skills of its developers. Additionally, Goldman Sachs intends to evaluate the long-term impact of generative AI on their software development processes and the overall quality of the applications being developed.

Goldman Sachs’ approach to AI implementation goes beyond merely executing models. The firm has created a platform encompassing technical, legal, and compliance assessments to filter out improper content and keep track of all interactions. This comprehensive system ensures seamless integration of artificial intelligence in operations while adhering to regulatory standards and maintaining client confidentiality. Moreover, the platform continuously improves and adapts its algorithms, allowing Goldman Sachs to stay at the forefront of technology and offer its clients the most efficient and secure services.

Featured Image Credit: Photo by Google DeepMind; Pexels; Thank you!

Deanna Ritchie

Managing Editor at ReadWrite

Deanna is the Managing Editor at ReadWrite. Previously she worked as the Editor in Chief for Startup Grind and has over 20+ years of experience in content management and content development.

Continue Reading

Politics

UK seizes web3 opportunity simplifying crypto regulations

Published

on

Deanna Ritchie


As Web3 companies increasingly consider leaving the United States due to regulatory ambiguity, the United Kingdom must simplify its cryptocurrency regulations to attract these businesses. The conservative think tank Policy Exchange recently released a report detailing ten suggestions for improving Web3 regulation in the country. Among the recommendations are reducing liability for token holders in decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) and encouraging the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) to adopt alternative Know Your Customer (KYC) methodologies, such as digital identities and blockchain analytics tools. These suggestions aim to position the UK as a hub for Web3 innovation and attract blockchain-based businesses looking for a more conducive regulatory environment.

Streamlining Cryptocurrency Regulations for Innovation

To make it easier for emerging Web3 companies to navigate existing legal frameworks and contribute to the UK’s digital economy growth, the government must streamline cryptocurrency regulations and adopt forward-looking approaches. By making the regulatory landscape clear and straightforward, the UK can create an environment that fosters innovation, growth, and competitiveness in the global fintech industry.

The Policy Exchange report also recommends not weakening self-hosted wallets or treating proof-of-stake (PoS) services as financial services. This approach aims to protect the fundamental principles of decentralization and user autonomy while strongly emphasizing security and regulatory compliance. By doing so, the UK can nurture an environment that encourages innovation and the continued growth of blockchain technology.

Despite recent strict measures by UK authorities, such as His Majesty’s Treasury and the FCA, toward the digital assets sector, the proposed changes in the Policy Exchange report strive to make the UK a more attractive location for Web3 enterprises. By adopting these suggestions, the UK can demonstrate its commitment to fostering innovation in the rapidly evolving blockchain and cryptocurrency industries while ensuring a robust and transparent regulatory environment.

The ongoing uncertainty surrounding cryptocurrency regulations in various countries has prompted Web3 companies to explore alternative jurisdictions with more precise legal frameworks. As the United States grapples with regulatory ambiguity, the United Kingdom can position itself as a hub for Web3 innovation by simplifying and streamlining its cryptocurrency regulations.

Featured Image Credit: Photo by Jonathan Borba; Pexels; Thank you!

Deanna Ritchie

Managing Editor at ReadWrite

Deanna is the Managing Editor at ReadWrite. Previously she worked as the Editor in Chief for Startup Grind and has over 20+ years of experience in content management and content development.

Continue Reading

Copyright © 2021 Seminole Press.