Connect with us

Politics

Should Your Startup Stay Remote or Head Back to the Office? – ReadWrite

Published

on

Nate Nead


In the past year, millions of businesses have transitioned to working from home. Many of these businesses have had plans to retain this operational model permanently – but a great deal of these changes were intended to be temporary measures to accommodate the pandemic. 

Similarly, many new businesses emerging in the modern world begin with a remote work model; it makes financial sense for young, cash-strapped businesses to save money and remain agile. But they have long-term plans to move to an office and construct a more conventional work environment. 

In both cases, leaders are tasked with making an important decision: is it better to stay working remotely or transition back to a traditional office? 

Transitioning to a Long-Term Remote Work Model 

If you’re currently enjoying the benefits of remote work, you might consider making it a permanent fixture in your organization. It’s tempting to simply keep things exactly as they are, so you can keep running smoothly, but there’s a better approach. 

Many businesses transitioned to a remote work model in a hurry, merely translating and reimagining existing processes for a slightly new environment. While functional and sustainable, this model may not yield the best possible results. Instead, its better to design your workflows and operational model from the ground up with remote work in mind. 

For example, if you’re used to having round-table meetings every Wednesday morning, you might have simply changed those meetings to occur over Zoom instead of in person. But if you’re designing new workflows from the ground up, you might be able to replace that meeting entirely with a check-in on a project management platform. 

Heading Back to the Office

Heading back to the office will present some challenges of its own, especially if you don’t currently have an office to go back to. If you and your team are used to working remotely, working in an office will be a major challenge for both productivity and morale. On top of that, you’ll need to find a new location that can accommodate your team. 

Hybrid Models

Keep in mind that you don’t have to exclusively transition to a fully remote model or a traditional office. You could also try to adopt some kind of hybrid model, taking advantage of the best of both worlds. 

This is tricky to pull off in practice, since you’ll essentially be managing multiple instances of your business simultaneously. However, you may be able to divide things efficiently based on something like: 

  • Roles. You might allow some of your team members to work from home, while others are required to be in the office regularly. 
  • Population segments. You could also establish a traditional office in your home city, while engaging with a much bigger remote workforce that is distributed across the country (or across the world). 
  • Days/hours. You may also split working from an office and working from home according to days or hours. For example, you might allow the team to work from home Thursday and Friday while coming into the office Monday through Wednesday. 

If you do this, your best bet for preserving employee morale is giving them some level of autonomy; in other words, let employees be in control of as much of their work environment as possible. Allow them to choose how they prefer to work. 

Key Factors to Consider

So how are you supposed to make this decision? 

You’ll need to spend some time reviewing the data available to you, including both objective metrics and subjective feedback. 

Consider: 

  • Productivity changes. One of the most important variables will be changes in productivity. After transitioning to working from home, how has productivity changed? Are your team members able to complete more tasks in a given period of time? Are they more likely to achieve their goals than before? It’s hard to argue with the benefits of remote work when your business is literally more profitable in a remote environment. 
  • Morale changes. You’ll also need to think about the morale changes within your team. Many people appreciate the opportunity to work from home, skipping the daily commute, getting more free time, and having the chance to create their own work environment from scratch – exactly how they want it. Happy workers will be willing to work harder for your organization and will be much less likely to leave. That said, there’s no guarantee that working from home has led to a morale increase; lonely and/or dissatisfied workers may benefit from going back to the office. 
  • Customer/client experiences. Has there been any meaningful impact on your clients and customers? For example, are customers benefitting from a faster response time when they reach out to your customer service team? Or has there been any slowdown since transitioning to working from home? Would you be able to provide more services to clients directly if you had a physical establishment for your business? 
  • Remote work infrastructure. If you’re utilizing digital platforms to do most of the heavy lifting in your business, your exact location probably won’t matter much. If you have project management platforms in place, solid workflows for remote work, and plenty of communication channels to support remote work, there’s less of a reason to go back to the office. If you’re struggling in the remote work world, an office environment may be superior. 
  • Employee feedback and opinions. How do employees feel about the idea of going back to the office? Is there a consensus that working from home is better? Or are people missing the idea of working together in an office again? Be sure to collect opinions from all your team members and examine the data both quantitatively and qualitatively. 
  • Scope of current workforce. Where are your team members currently located? If 90 percent of your team is operating in the same city, because you used to work in the same office building, the transition to an office will be much easier than if you’re working with employees and contractors all over the world. 
  • Existing office resources. Do you currently have an office to go back to? If so, the transition would be much easier. If you need to look for a brand new building, you’ll have to spend a lot of time and money finding the right place. 
  • Security. You’ll also need to consider the security of your operations. With the right tools and practices, remote work can be perfectly secure – but if your setup is currently optimized for a traditional work environment, you’ll need to make some major changes to be successful. 
  • Ongoing office costs. How much would it cost to maintain a traditional office environment? There are many costs to consider, including the office lease, the cost of utilities, and the cost of maintenance and upkeep. Is it really worth the money just to have people in close proximity to each other? 
  • Teambuilding dynamics. How are your team members working together and getting along? Has there been a significant drop in camaraderie and/or team dynamics since you’ve been working from home? Is there any other way you can repair this? 
  • Future flexibility. Thanks to IoT and other advanced technologies, it’s getting easier and easier to transition between traditional and remote work environments. But it’s still important to think about the long-term future of the company. What’s your vision for the next 10 years? Will you have the flexibility to make changes in the years to come? 

Some of these factors will be more important to your business than others. It’s important to understand your top goals and priorities before doing the analysis and making the final call. 

Remote work and traditional office-based environments each have their advantages and disadvantages; be careful not to make a decision based on your preconceived notions of how these work environments function. Analyze objective data wherever you can, consider every option available to you, and make gradual changes until your work environment is everything you need it to be. 

Nate Nead

Nate Nead is the CEO & Managing Member of Nead, LLC, a consulting company that provides strategic advisory services across multiple disciplines including finance, marketing and software development. For over a decade Nate had provided strategic guidance on M&A, capital procurement, technology and marketing solutions for some of the most well-known online brands. He and his team advise Fortune 500 and SMB clients alike. The team is based in Seattle, Washington; El Paso, Texas and West Palm Beach, Florida.

Politics

Fintech Kennek raises $12.5M seed round to digitize lending

Published

on

Google eyed for $2 billion Anthropic deal after major Amazon play


London-based fintech startup Kennek has raised $12.5 million in seed funding to expand its lending operating system.

According to an Oct. 10 tech.eu report, the round was led by HV Capital and included participation from Dutch Founders Fund, AlbionVC, FFVC, Plug & Play Ventures, and Syndicate One. Kennek offers software-as-a-service tools to help non-bank lenders streamline their operations using open banking, open finance, and payments.

The platform aims to automate time-consuming manual tasks and consolidate fragmented data to simplify lending. Xavier De Pauw, founder of Kennek said:

“Until kennek, lenders had to devote countless hours to menial operational tasks and deal with jumbled and hard-coded data – which makes every other part of lending a headache. As former lenders ourselves, we lived and breathed these frustrations, and built kennek to make them a thing of the past.”

The company said the latest funding round was oversubscribed and closed quickly despite the challenging fundraising environment. The new capital will be used to expand Kennek’s engineering team and strengthen its market position in the UK while exploring expansion into other European markets. Barbod Namini, Partner at lead investor HV Capital, commented on the investment:

“Kennek has developed an ambitious and genuinely unique proposition which we think can be the foundation of the entire alternative lending space. […] It is a complicated market and a solution that brings together all information and stakeholders onto a single platform is highly compelling for both lenders & the ecosystem as a whole.”

The fintech lending space has grown rapidly in recent years, but many lenders still rely on legacy systems and manual processes that limit efficiency and scalability. Kennek aims to leverage open banking and data integration to provide lenders with a more streamlined, automated lending experience.

The seed funding will allow the London-based startup to continue developing its platform and expanding its team to meet demand from non-bank lenders looking to digitize operations. Kennek’s focus on the UK and Europe also comes amid rising adoption of open banking and open finance in the regions.

Featured Image Credit: Photo from Kennek.io; Thank you!

Radek Zielinski

Radek Zielinski is an experienced technology and financial journalist with a passion for cybersecurity and futurology.

Continue Reading

Politics

Fortune 500’s race for generative AI breakthroughs

Published

on

Deanna Ritchie


As excitement around generative AI grows, Fortune 500 companies, including Goldman Sachs, are carefully examining the possible applications of this technology. A recent survey of U.S. executives indicated that 60% believe generative AI will substantially impact their businesses in the long term. However, they anticipate a one to two-year timeframe before implementing their initial solutions. This optimism stems from the potential of generative AI to revolutionize various aspects of businesses, from enhancing customer experiences to optimizing internal processes. In the short term, companies will likely focus on pilot projects and experimentation, gradually integrating generative AI into their operations as they witness its positive influence on efficiency and profitability.

Goldman Sachs’ Cautious Approach to Implementing Generative AI

In a recent interview, Goldman Sachs CIO Marco Argenti revealed that the firm has not yet implemented any generative AI use cases. Instead, the company focuses on experimentation and setting high standards before adopting the technology. Argenti recognized the desire for outcomes in areas like developer and operational efficiency but emphasized ensuring precision before putting experimental AI use cases into production.

According to Argenti, striking the right balance between driving innovation and maintaining accuracy is crucial for successfully integrating generative AI within the firm. Goldman Sachs intends to continue exploring this emerging technology’s potential benefits and applications while diligently assessing risks to ensure it meets the company’s stringent quality standards.

One possible application for Goldman Sachs is in software development, where the company has observed a 20-40% productivity increase during its trials. The goal is for 1,000 developers to utilize generative AI tools by year’s end. However, Argenti emphasized that a well-defined expectation of return on investment is necessary before fully integrating generative AI into production.

To achieve this, the company plans to implement a systematic and strategic approach to adopting generative AI, ensuring that it complements and enhances the skills of its developers. Additionally, Goldman Sachs intends to evaluate the long-term impact of generative AI on their software development processes and the overall quality of the applications being developed.

Goldman Sachs’ approach to AI implementation goes beyond merely executing models. The firm has created a platform encompassing technical, legal, and compliance assessments to filter out improper content and keep track of all interactions. This comprehensive system ensures seamless integration of artificial intelligence in operations while adhering to regulatory standards and maintaining client confidentiality. Moreover, the platform continuously improves and adapts its algorithms, allowing Goldman Sachs to stay at the forefront of technology and offer its clients the most efficient and secure services.

Featured Image Credit: Photo by Google DeepMind; Pexels; Thank you!

Deanna Ritchie

Managing Editor at ReadWrite

Deanna is the Managing Editor at ReadWrite. Previously she worked as the Editor in Chief for Startup Grind and has over 20+ years of experience in content management and content development.

Continue Reading

Politics

UK seizes web3 opportunity simplifying crypto regulations

Published

on

Deanna Ritchie


As Web3 companies increasingly consider leaving the United States due to regulatory ambiguity, the United Kingdom must simplify its cryptocurrency regulations to attract these businesses. The conservative think tank Policy Exchange recently released a report detailing ten suggestions for improving Web3 regulation in the country. Among the recommendations are reducing liability for token holders in decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) and encouraging the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) to adopt alternative Know Your Customer (KYC) methodologies, such as digital identities and blockchain analytics tools. These suggestions aim to position the UK as a hub for Web3 innovation and attract blockchain-based businesses looking for a more conducive regulatory environment.

Streamlining Cryptocurrency Regulations for Innovation

To make it easier for emerging Web3 companies to navigate existing legal frameworks and contribute to the UK’s digital economy growth, the government must streamline cryptocurrency regulations and adopt forward-looking approaches. By making the regulatory landscape clear and straightforward, the UK can create an environment that fosters innovation, growth, and competitiveness in the global fintech industry.

The Policy Exchange report also recommends not weakening self-hosted wallets or treating proof-of-stake (PoS) services as financial services. This approach aims to protect the fundamental principles of decentralization and user autonomy while strongly emphasizing security and regulatory compliance. By doing so, the UK can nurture an environment that encourages innovation and the continued growth of blockchain technology.

Despite recent strict measures by UK authorities, such as His Majesty’s Treasury and the FCA, toward the digital assets sector, the proposed changes in the Policy Exchange report strive to make the UK a more attractive location for Web3 enterprises. By adopting these suggestions, the UK can demonstrate its commitment to fostering innovation in the rapidly evolving blockchain and cryptocurrency industries while ensuring a robust and transparent regulatory environment.

The ongoing uncertainty surrounding cryptocurrency regulations in various countries has prompted Web3 companies to explore alternative jurisdictions with more precise legal frameworks. As the United States grapples with regulatory ambiguity, the United Kingdom can position itself as a hub for Web3 innovation by simplifying and streamlining its cryptocurrency regulations.

Featured Image Credit: Photo by Jonathan Borba; Pexels; Thank you!

Deanna Ritchie

Managing Editor at ReadWrite

Deanna is the Managing Editor at ReadWrite. Previously she worked as the Editor in Chief for Startup Grind and has over 20+ years of experience in content management and content development.

Continue Reading

Copyright © 2021 Seminole Press.