Connect with us

Politics

The 10 Best and 10 Worst States for Retirees: A Comprehensive Guide

Published

on

Free Your Money: Strategies for Keeping Your Money In The Best Place Possible - ReadWrite


Many people are more mobile and moving today thanks to the benefits of technology and working remotely. People nearing retirement age are also looking for new places to call home. A recent study by Blacktower Financial Management Group analyzed the best and worst states for retirees. This article will break down these states one by one.

The Best and Worst States To Retire In

If you’re planning to retire now or in the near future, there are many factors to consider. For example, you should pay off big expenses, take stock of your investments to update your retirement plan, and educate yourself about Medicare and social security benefits. You may also want to move to a new place and need to work on repairing your credit before purchasing a home you can live in during retirement.

Blacktower Financial Management Group’s recent study generated an index of all 50 states and shared the results on the best and worst states to live in to simplify the retirement process. To calculate the index, they normalized different data categories individually from 0 to 1 and then summed the results. The study looked at crime, cost of living, % of the population over 65, property prices, and life expectancy.

Now that you know how the study was generated, let’s jump into the 10 best and 10 worst states for retirees!

10 Best States to Retire In

1. Florida

The Sunshine State takes the top spot as the best place for retirees. Approximately 25.6% of Florida’s population is over the age of 65, which means that retirees won’t find themselves crowded out by younger groups. Florida’s low cost of living, average home price of $252,309, and higher life expectancy are also what bring it to the top of the list.

Additionally, Florida is perfect for working retirees or those running a business on the side, with its low effective tax rate and leading position in business innovation and growth.

2. Minnesota

The Midwestern state of Minnesota arrived at number two on the list. The state has low crime, a low cost of living, and a high life expectancy. Lower living costs can make it easier to create your retirement plan and stick to it.

3. Iowa

Iowa’s cost of living index came in at 91.9, and the crime index was almost comparable to Minnesota’s at 293.4. What makes Iowa so desirable for retirees is the low cost of living and an average home price of $154,727. Furthermore, Iowa’s life expectancy is higher than Florida’s, with an average age of 79.7.

4. Ohio

Ohio boasts a low crime index, a low cost of living, and a comparable percentage of the population over the age of 65 at 22.3%. Ohio’s home prices were also similar to Iowa’s, with an average home costing only $153,593.

5. Texas

Of the top 10 states, Texas had the lowest percentage of the population in their retirement age, with only 16.8% being over 65. Texas’ average home prices split the difference between more expensive states in the top 10, like Florida, and less expensive states, like Iowa and Ohio. However, Texas homes are among the largest in the country.

6. Wisconsin

Wisconsin boasted a life expectancy of 80 years, comparable home prices to other top 10 contenders, and a low cost of living index of 96.4 points. Wisconsin also demonstrated a high percentage of the population over 65 at 22.0%.

7. Nebraska

Nebraska’s low cost of living and average home price ($178,938) were key to the state making the top ten. Nebraska also had a low crime index of 305.9. Finally, Nebraska’s life expectancy came quite close to Wisconsin’s at 79.8.

8. Pennsylvania

Pennsylvania demonstrated above-average marks across the board but was notable for having a fairly low average cost for homes at $178,938. Pennsylvania also had a slightly higher-than-average crime and cost of living index. Finally, the percentage of the population over 65 was 23.7%.

9. Illinois

Illinois had the highest crime rate index of any top 10 states at 438.8. However, Illinois home prices resembled others in the top 10 at $204,839. Overall, Illinois was similarly situated compared to other states in the top 10.

10. Idaho

Rounding out the top 10 best states to retire to is Idaho. Idaho was a popular destination during the Covid-19 pandemic because of its low cost of living. It remains a great place for retirees because of its low crime and average life expectancy.

10 Worst States To Retire In

1. Alaska

The worst state to retire in was Alaska. Alaska’s crime index was 829, and only 15.8% of its population was over 65. Alaska also had a high average home cost of $300,073.

2. Hawaii

Although the average life expectancy was 81.3, Hawaii’s average home cost of $642,526 and a high cost of living index (191.8) make it one of the worst states to live in after retiring.

3. Nevada

Nevada faced a high crime index of 555.9, a high average home price of $309.730, and a lower life expectancy of 78.1. Although the state has a favorable tax climate, higher home costs can make it harder to save for retirement and make those savings last.

4. New Mexico

Facing similar crime index problems as Alaska, New Mexico had a crime index of 783.5, a cost of living index of 88.2, and a below-average life expectancy of 78.4.

5. Tennessee

Tennessee also displayed a higher crime index of 651.5. Another issue the state faced was a low life expectancy of 76.3. Although it was near the bottom of the list, Tennessee home prices were fair, averaging $192,630.

6. Alabama

Alabama faced a low life expectancy of 75.4 and a higher crime index (524.2). One promising aspect of Alabama was its low average cost of a home at $143,072. If you’re concerned about life expectancy and want to make sure your spouse and children are provided for in the event of the worst happening, consider whether a life insurance plan for couples is right for you and your family.

7. Louisiana

Louisiana faced a similar high crime index as the other top 10 worst places to live. It also had a low average life expectancy of 75.7. Additionally, only 20.1% of its population is over 65, so it’s more suitable for younger generations.

8. Maryland

Maryland’s high crime index is one of the reasons it’s placed at #8 of the worst states to retire in. It also had a low life expectancy of 78.8 and a high cost of living index at 127.6

9. Arkansas

Arkansas had a lower-than-average life expectancy of 76.0 and a higher crime index at 554.9. However, low housing costs and a lower cost of living helped keep it from the absolute bottom.

10. Montana

Montana displayed similar problems to others in the top ten worst places to live. It had a higher crime index, a higher cost of living than Nevada and Hawaii, and a higher average home cost of $288,867.

Published First on Due. Read Here.

Featured Image Credit: Photo by Los Muertos Crew; Pexels; Thank you!

Due

Know exactly how much money you will have going into your bank account each month. No tricks, no gimmicks. Simple retirement for the modern day human.

Politics

Fintech Kennek raises $12.5M seed round to digitize lending

Published

on

Google eyed for $2 billion Anthropic deal after major Amazon play


London-based fintech startup Kennek has raised $12.5 million in seed funding to expand its lending operating system.

According to an Oct. 10 tech.eu report, the round was led by HV Capital and included participation from Dutch Founders Fund, AlbionVC, FFVC, Plug & Play Ventures, and Syndicate One. Kennek offers software-as-a-service tools to help non-bank lenders streamline their operations using open banking, open finance, and payments.

The platform aims to automate time-consuming manual tasks and consolidate fragmented data to simplify lending. Xavier De Pauw, founder of Kennek said:

“Until kennek, lenders had to devote countless hours to menial operational tasks and deal with jumbled and hard-coded data – which makes every other part of lending a headache. As former lenders ourselves, we lived and breathed these frustrations, and built kennek to make them a thing of the past.”

The company said the latest funding round was oversubscribed and closed quickly despite the challenging fundraising environment. The new capital will be used to expand Kennek’s engineering team and strengthen its market position in the UK while exploring expansion into other European markets. Barbod Namini, Partner at lead investor HV Capital, commented on the investment:

“Kennek has developed an ambitious and genuinely unique proposition which we think can be the foundation of the entire alternative lending space. […] It is a complicated market and a solution that brings together all information and stakeholders onto a single platform is highly compelling for both lenders & the ecosystem as a whole.”

The fintech lending space has grown rapidly in recent years, but many lenders still rely on legacy systems and manual processes that limit efficiency and scalability. Kennek aims to leverage open banking and data integration to provide lenders with a more streamlined, automated lending experience.

The seed funding will allow the London-based startup to continue developing its platform and expanding its team to meet demand from non-bank lenders looking to digitize operations. Kennek’s focus on the UK and Europe also comes amid rising adoption of open banking and open finance in the regions.

Featured Image Credit: Photo from Kennek.io; Thank you!

Radek Zielinski

Radek Zielinski is an experienced technology and financial journalist with a passion for cybersecurity and futurology.

Continue Reading

Politics

Fortune 500’s race for generative AI breakthroughs

Published

on

Deanna Ritchie


As excitement around generative AI grows, Fortune 500 companies, including Goldman Sachs, are carefully examining the possible applications of this technology. A recent survey of U.S. executives indicated that 60% believe generative AI will substantially impact their businesses in the long term. However, they anticipate a one to two-year timeframe before implementing their initial solutions. This optimism stems from the potential of generative AI to revolutionize various aspects of businesses, from enhancing customer experiences to optimizing internal processes. In the short term, companies will likely focus on pilot projects and experimentation, gradually integrating generative AI into their operations as they witness its positive influence on efficiency and profitability.

Goldman Sachs’ Cautious Approach to Implementing Generative AI

In a recent interview, Goldman Sachs CIO Marco Argenti revealed that the firm has not yet implemented any generative AI use cases. Instead, the company focuses on experimentation and setting high standards before adopting the technology. Argenti recognized the desire for outcomes in areas like developer and operational efficiency but emphasized ensuring precision before putting experimental AI use cases into production.

According to Argenti, striking the right balance between driving innovation and maintaining accuracy is crucial for successfully integrating generative AI within the firm. Goldman Sachs intends to continue exploring this emerging technology’s potential benefits and applications while diligently assessing risks to ensure it meets the company’s stringent quality standards.

One possible application for Goldman Sachs is in software development, where the company has observed a 20-40% productivity increase during its trials. The goal is for 1,000 developers to utilize generative AI tools by year’s end. However, Argenti emphasized that a well-defined expectation of return on investment is necessary before fully integrating generative AI into production.

To achieve this, the company plans to implement a systematic and strategic approach to adopting generative AI, ensuring that it complements and enhances the skills of its developers. Additionally, Goldman Sachs intends to evaluate the long-term impact of generative AI on their software development processes and the overall quality of the applications being developed.

Goldman Sachs’ approach to AI implementation goes beyond merely executing models. The firm has created a platform encompassing technical, legal, and compliance assessments to filter out improper content and keep track of all interactions. This comprehensive system ensures seamless integration of artificial intelligence in operations while adhering to regulatory standards and maintaining client confidentiality. Moreover, the platform continuously improves and adapts its algorithms, allowing Goldman Sachs to stay at the forefront of technology and offer its clients the most efficient and secure services.

Featured Image Credit: Photo by Google DeepMind; Pexels; Thank you!

Deanna Ritchie

Managing Editor at ReadWrite

Deanna is the Managing Editor at ReadWrite. Previously she worked as the Editor in Chief for Startup Grind and has over 20+ years of experience in content management and content development.

Continue Reading

Politics

UK seizes web3 opportunity simplifying crypto regulations

Published

on

Deanna Ritchie


As Web3 companies increasingly consider leaving the United States due to regulatory ambiguity, the United Kingdom must simplify its cryptocurrency regulations to attract these businesses. The conservative think tank Policy Exchange recently released a report detailing ten suggestions for improving Web3 regulation in the country. Among the recommendations are reducing liability for token holders in decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) and encouraging the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) to adopt alternative Know Your Customer (KYC) methodologies, such as digital identities and blockchain analytics tools. These suggestions aim to position the UK as a hub for Web3 innovation and attract blockchain-based businesses looking for a more conducive regulatory environment.

Streamlining Cryptocurrency Regulations for Innovation

To make it easier for emerging Web3 companies to navigate existing legal frameworks and contribute to the UK’s digital economy growth, the government must streamline cryptocurrency regulations and adopt forward-looking approaches. By making the regulatory landscape clear and straightforward, the UK can create an environment that fosters innovation, growth, and competitiveness in the global fintech industry.

The Policy Exchange report also recommends not weakening self-hosted wallets or treating proof-of-stake (PoS) services as financial services. This approach aims to protect the fundamental principles of decentralization and user autonomy while strongly emphasizing security and regulatory compliance. By doing so, the UK can nurture an environment that encourages innovation and the continued growth of blockchain technology.

Despite recent strict measures by UK authorities, such as His Majesty’s Treasury and the FCA, toward the digital assets sector, the proposed changes in the Policy Exchange report strive to make the UK a more attractive location for Web3 enterprises. By adopting these suggestions, the UK can demonstrate its commitment to fostering innovation in the rapidly evolving blockchain and cryptocurrency industries while ensuring a robust and transparent regulatory environment.

The ongoing uncertainty surrounding cryptocurrency regulations in various countries has prompted Web3 companies to explore alternative jurisdictions with more precise legal frameworks. As the United States grapples with regulatory ambiguity, the United Kingdom can position itself as a hub for Web3 innovation by simplifying and streamlining its cryptocurrency regulations.

Featured Image Credit: Photo by Jonathan Borba; Pexels; Thank you!

Deanna Ritchie

Managing Editor at ReadWrite

Deanna is the Managing Editor at ReadWrite. Previously she worked as the Editor in Chief for Startup Grind and has over 20+ years of experience in content management and content development.

Continue Reading

Copyright © 2021 Seminole Press.