Connect with us

Politics

Turing Distinguished Leader Series: Darren Murph Head of Remote at GitLab Part II – ReadWrite

Published

2 years ago

on

Turing Distinguished Leader Series: Darren Murph Head of Remote at GitLab Part II - ReadWrite


Hi, everyone! Thank you for the great response to our Distinguished Leader Series!  Here’s the second part of my talk with GitLab’s Head of Remote, Darren Murph.  If you missed part 1 of this conversation where we dig into how GitLab runs a multi-billion dollar remote-first company — you can find it here. 

Jonathan Siddharth:

How would you recommend managers with distributed teams think about the time zone issue? 

Darren Murph:

Time zones are the bane of any company’s existence. Unfortunately, time zones are hard for co-located companies as well. If you’ve ever worked at a co-located office in Seattle with colleagues in Singapore, you know what I’m talking about. The solution is to shift work to asynchronous workflows wherever possible. And so, if there’s anything that can be reduced to a document and written down and ingested at a time that is more suitable for a wide array of time zones, make sure that you do that. 

You’re going to need to be clear with your direct reports on ways of working. Empower and enable them with the right tools to collaborate asynchronously across time zones. And although email is asynchronous by nature, it’s not a great tool for asynchronous work because it’s inherently siloed. It’s tough to get transparency on email. 

At GitLab, we use the GitLab Platform to collaborate company-wide. If you’re a leader, make sure that there’s a tool in place, a central hallway where work can be done so that you break those chains of synchronicity wherever possible.

Jonathan Siddharth:

What tools in your toolkit do you recommend for people to shift from synchronous to asynchronous?

Darren Murph: 

Of course, I recommend GitLab, especially if you’re already using it for engineering; use it for collaboration across the entire organization. Dropbox Space is an excellent, centralized hallway. Miro and Mural are phenomenal tools. Figma is another one for those looking for tooling design and collaboration space. If you’re trying to stand up a company handbook, Almanac.io is a fantastic tool because they have structured approvals, which is very similar to the merge request. Try to simplify your tool stack as much as possible. 

At GitLab, it is written in our handbook that every work meeting must have a Google doc agenda attached in the inbox. So the meeting organizer has to draft up the agenda, the attendees’ overview, and expected outcomes, and then send the calendar invite. This way, if you’re not attending the meeting, you’re able to at least immediately click on the document, add context, add your questions, and then someone can verbalize that question for you and document the answer. This way, you’re able to contribute asynchronously, even to a process that may usually be synchronous. 

Jonathan Siddharth:

Speaking of GitLab, it sounds like you can use it for various use cases that go beyond code collaboration and co-host. Can you share a bit of the primary use cases that you use GitLab for in the company for collaboration?

Darren Murph:

Yeah, we use it across the company. So, even though our designers don’t design illustrations in GitLab, they would share those in something like Figma. But we would still start a GitLab issue within the design team to collaborate on Figma links. And that enables transparency.

Even those who don’t work in design or demonstration can jump into the GitLab Platform and have visibility into their team. In addition, this approach lets them provide input and feedback. And so, when you use it as a collaboration tool, we recognize that it becomes advantageous outside of engineering. We want to work to remove silos actively, and a great way to do that is to choose a collaboration platform like GitLab and funnel your work through it.

Jonathan Siddharth:

Do you have any best practices that you would recommend for remote-first companies in their use of video conferencing software like Zoom and so on? And it sounds like for a lot of these; it’s not just the tool; it’s also how you use them and what’s the process scaffolding you put around it.

Darren Murph:

Yeah, it has to be a combination of both. We use Zoom. It’s a pretty boring solution, but it scales well. And so if we do have a company all-hands and we need 1300 people on a Zoom call, it will stand up to that. But speaking of using common tools in uncommon ways, if we have to have a work-related meeting, we will have the meeting as either 25 minutes instead of 30 or 50 instead of 60. 

Now Google calls these speedy meetings, but this kind of goes back to how we use it. We cut the meeting after 25 minutes instead of 30 so that you aren’t back to back with the schedule. You will undoubtedly meet someone experiencing Zoom fatigue, and it can be as simple as adding five or 10 minutes here and there to give folks a breather. I think we’re in the earliest of innings, so watch the space. Some amazing innovations are coming out of that.

Jonathan Siddharth:

That sounds great. And earlier on, you mentioned how you like to set up these coffee chats with people within the first month to help new joiners get fully onboarded. Are there any tools or products that you found that solve that use case well?

Darren Murph:

If you want to randomize it, Donut is a great solution. But I would also say, create a community or topical channels if you’re a leader and have access to administrative space within Slack. If you create spaces like hiking or cooking, or location channels, you’ll find that people join sub-channels relevant to them. And then, once they’re in that sub-community, it becomes easier to set up coffee chats and make connections.

Jonathan Siddharth:

That’s super helpful. Can you share your advice to founders running distributed teams today? For example, how do you pull off a happy hour with a globally distributed group of people in different time zones?

Darren Murph:

Yeah, so I’ll give you an example of a 24-hour virtual pizza party. So, as a celebration for a certain team, we had a 24-hour virtual pizza party. We had our employees enjoy pizza with their families, bill it back to the company, and share their pictures. It’s a straightforward solution, but it reinforces that groupthink global demeanor. Instead, we should celebrate the differences among us, including the best in residence in geography.

You don’t have to plan a virtual happy hour, especially a synchronous one every week, to feel like you’re bringing your team together. This practice is a bit paradoxical, but the more you let go of your team and empower your people to go out in their communities and then share those videos and photos with the team, the closer the individuals on your team will get because they see each other’s real personalities, and what makes them unique. 

Jonathan Siddharth:

That sounds great! Do you use Slack for messaging, or do you use some other tool?

Darren Murph:

We use Slack, but we expire all of our Slack messages after 90 days, and this is a very simple forcing function so that we don’t do long-form, deep work in Slack. When we realize incubation is happening in a Slack channel, we create a GitHub issue and port the conversation so that the work continues over there. Slack is just a medium to share different GitLab links to ensure that we continue to work in the most transparent way possible. 

Jonathan Siddharth:

And what is the repository of knowledge at GitLab?

Darren Murph:

It won’t surprise you that we use the GitLab Handbook. And we use the merge request functionality so that anyone in the company can propose any page in the company handbook. So for companies already using GitLab, it is possible to build your company handbook. Also, as I’ve mentioned earlier, Almanac.io is a great place to start.

Jonathan Siddharth:

That’s good to know. Regarding one-on-ones that happen between managers in a fully distributed team, do you have any best practices for managers on how to conduct them?

Darren Murph:

Yeah, so every one-on-one has a Google doc, an ongoing agenda. And what’s great about this is it allows topics that you didn’t get to cover to stay there still, and then you’re able to move it up to the next date so that things don’t just fall away. 

A side note here is that our team does async weeks where we decline all internal meetings, and we move everything async every six weeks. We do this with one-on-ones as well. 

The last thing I’ll mention here is to make sure that the one-on-one is the direct reports meeting. I see many leaders have one-on-ones where they direct the entire game, which goes back to being a director. So they see a one-on-one as an opportunity to list out all of the to-dos for their direct report. But the problem with that is it doesn’t give the direct report a medium to voice their challenges or ask questions or talk about career development.

So the manager has to be very careful not to override the one-on-one. Instead, the manager should see it as an opportunity to unblock instead of just loading someone up with to-do tasks.

Jonathan Siddharth:

That’s super helpful. Have you seen any good tools that people use for recording and transcribing meetings to make a synchronous meeting count some of the benefits of an async meeting, or do you intentionally avoid doing that?

Darren Murph:

There are some tools. Firefly is one. Then there is Otter, of course. I know many sales teams use Gong, an excellent tool for analyzing those calls and helping sales teams make recommendations for changes in their behavior. I’m in favor of leveraging technology to make lives easier. However, some of those tools can be a bit finicky because they are just raw transcription tools. So sometimes they miss the context or create sentences that didn’t happen, so they’re not perfect, but they’re certainly better than no documentation at all.

Jonathan Siddharth:

As many companies think about their post-pandemic work strategy, what is your advice for previously office-centric companies? Now they’ve remained distributed. Their teams, probably a majority of the people at the company, prefer to be the work from home—work from anywhere culture. What is your advice for leaders at those companies on how they think about their post-pandemic work strategy?

Darren Murph:

So I mentioned a few points here, but before I do that, I would say go to allremote.info and download the remote playbook. That is the blueprint for making this transition, and we recently refreshed it specifically for the use case you just mentioned. 

We want to help leaders build long-term sustainable remote work environments. A lot of leaders are keeping some office space, and they’re attempting to go hybrid. There’s this thought that hybrid is going to be the best of both worlds. But without a lot of intentionalities, it can easily become the worst of both worlds. 

You do not want to foster an environment where a subset of your organization works office-first. And a subset works remote-first. You want everyone working remote-first because that makes your company more resilient to future crises. And if you do maintain an office, you want to make sure that it’s not the epicenter of power. You don’t want people going there to rub shoulders with the right people or advance their careers. I realize this sounds crazy, but if they go to the office, they should only go there to work remotely from the office and treat it more like a coworking space. 

The last piece of advice I want to reiterate to leaders is if you are reopening an office, I would advise you not to go back at all, and definitely don’t be the first one back in the office, because it sends the signal that the office is still the epicenter of power. And if you have spent the last 18 or 24 months building remote muscle through the pandemic, all of that will evaporate if you send the signal that everyone needs to be in a physical space, else they are risking their career. So leaders need to be mindful of the signals they are sending.

Jonathan Siddharth:

And what have you seen so far, Darren, regarding companies that run surveys in their team? I’m curious what you’ve seen from your vantage point about what the employees prefer. And is that any different from what management tends to choose in a choice like this?

Darren Murph:

We just surveyed almost 4,000 people globally. You can search for GitLab’s Remote Work Report and dig into all sorts of data, but I want to call out a few points here that I think are pertinent to this conversation.

One in three people said that if their work refused to allow flexibility coming out of COVID, they would just find another job. And I think this number will only increase as we move out of the pandemic. People at large already enjoy the freedom and autonomy of remote work during the worst of times. 

So from a talent acquisition and retention standpoint, there’s no going back for many people. Organizations are going to have to answer the question as to what is their stance on workplace flexibility. 

The other thing is this disconnect between people saying that they love remote work and saying that the organization hasn’t yet built the infrastructure to support them. So people are raising their hands and saying: “I love remote work,” but they’re also saying: “My company feels disorganized and unprepared for this change.” So I think this is an excellent opportunity for leaders to acknowledge where people generally want to go and build proper infrastructure for them to work in a remote setting.

Jonathan Siddharth:

Based on what you just said, what can a company do to be best in class to prepare for a remote-first workforce?

Darren Murph:

Honestly, the first thing you can do is hire a Head of Remote or put someone in charge of the remote transition. There’s nothing more important to the company than signaling that this is a serious and long-term consideration. Most importantly, if someone is in charge of the transition, they can then be responsible for going around the organization and pressure testing, all of the things that we mentioned earlier.

The other element I would recommend here is to invest in L & D. You have to remember that not everyone will know how to work well in a remote setting. Not every manager fully understands the nuances of managing in a remote environment. And for some of these people, you will have to upskill and teach them. So L & D organizations are spinning up things like editorial workshops to teach people how to communicate well through the written word. In a remote setting, that’s a critical skill. So the organization will be on the hook for upskilling employees, which will be setting them up for success when the future is remote.

Jonathan Siddharth:

That’s super interesting. When you hire global talent worldwide, people come from different cultures and backgrounds; there are societal, cultural norms for people growing up in other countries. Is there something GitLab does intentionally to bridge that cultural gap to get people more comfortable with a particular way of working?

For example, in some cultures, people are not comfortable speaking out against a manager’s deadline. They don’t feel comfortable debating and disagreeing with an idea and brainstorming. Is this something that you observe, and if so, is there anything you do at GitLab to bring together people from different cultures to do a more standard way of working?

Darren Murph:

There are two things you can do here. The first is to be explicit in powering, recommending, and encouraging things like dissent. We have a sub-value that’s titled ‘The Value in Dissent.’ So we write down that you are empowered and encouraged to show disagreement. I understand that having it written down for some cultures isn’t enough because perhaps the employee has worked in an organization where dissent was encouraged. Still, when they tried to do it, the outcome wasn’t so positive for them. So now they’re a bit hesitant to believe what’s written down. 

In that case, I think the only next thing you can do is reinforce it by leadership. It pretty much has to be top-down. Ensure that your senior leaders are open to dissent and open to that kind of feedback from people. Make sure that you share it as transparently as possible so that when other people see things like this happening, they’ll perhaps be more comfortable and more likely to read into it themselves. It’s critical from a cultural standpoint to lead by example. Because to your point, not everyone’s going to believe a document. 

Jonathan Siddharth:

I’ve seen you reference these written-down values a few times in our chat. So how does the company go about compiling this handbook of values?

Darren Murph:

It started a long time ago, and it’s a living, breathing document. We made hundreds of updates and iterations to the GitLab Values page in 2020. So for many companies, values were written one time by the founding team, and then they just collect dust in the corner.

I would encourage teams to build it with a tool like GitLab or Almanac and empower the entire team to contribute feedback to make it more robust. If it’s a living, breathing document, people are more likely to adhere to the values. In truth, culture is just a barometer of how well values are adhered to. So a lot of teams will wonder: “How do I create culture?”. Well, write great values, and the culture will be how well those values are adhered to.

Jonathan Siddharth:

I think that’s a great place to start, Darren. This conversation was super helpful and valuable for all leaders trying to think about building successful remote-first companies. Thank you so much for taking the time to have this conversation with me today. And what’s the place where people who enjoyed listening to you can learn more, where should they go?

Darren Murph:

Thank you for the forum. Thanks all for your attention. Be sure to check out allremote.info to download the playbook that I’ve authored for GitLab. You’ll find me on LinkedIn, Twitter, the usual places at @DarrenMurph.

Watch the complete interview.

Image Credit: provided by the author, jonathan siddharth; thank you!

Jonathan Siddharth

Jonathan is the CEO and Co-Founder of Turing.com. Turing is an automated platform that lets companies “push a button” to hire and manage remote developers. Turing uses data science to automatically source, vet, match, and manage remote developers from all over the world.
Turing has 160K developers on the platform from almost every country in the world. Turing’s mission is to help every remote-first tech company build boundaryless teams.
Turing is backed by Foundation Capital, Adam D’Angelo who was Facebook’s first CTO & CEO of Quora, Gokul Rajaram, Cyan Banister, Jeff Morris, and executives from Google and Facebook. The Information, Entrepreneur, and other major publications have profiled Turing.
Before starting Turing, Jonathan was an Entrepreneur in Residence at Foundation Capital. Following the successful sale of his first AI company, Rover, that he co-founded while still at Stanford. In his spare time, Jonathan likes helping early-stage entrepreneurs build and scale companies.
You can find him Jonathan @jonsidd on Twitter and jonathan.s@turing.com. His LinkedIn is https://www.linkedin.com/in/jonsid/

Related Topics:
Continue Reading

Politics

Soft Skills in Tech: Seeking Teachability in New Hires

Published

4 hours ago

on

05/28/2023

By

4 Ways Leaders Can Better Support Women in Tech


It’s no simple task hiring talent — tech talent even more so. According to a Gartner survey, it’s one of the main reasons why so many companies struggle to adopt emerging technologies and maintain a competitive edge; they simply can’t find quality talent.

This labor shortage is at least partly due to the talent market, which has gotten tighter in recent years. But the barrier to finding talent also has something to do with technology itself.

Getting Ahead of the Curve

The rapid pace of digital change means that what an employee learns today may be outdated tomorrow, or the tech may be updated to a new version or language, making teachability a skill to prize above all.

Take a student who is currently studying code. That individual may be learning a version of a language that will be outdated by the time they graduate from the course. Education teams should be updating course content strategically; knowing that new versions of languages have bugs that have not yet been discovered, they should work to ensure that the version is applicable to learning the latest iteration.

Even then, however, it can still be challenging to find talent. New digital options emerge almost daily. The onus is often on employees to find creative and strategic ways to apply technologies that enable companies to continue doing what they do well.

Working in a State of Constant Learning

While companies will obviously want to hire based on whatever skills are necessary for the role, soft skills in tech are just as important. To continue to thrive in the technology field, candidates must demonstrate an ability to think critically.

They must exhibit the ability and desire to seek solutions to problems they can’t yet anticipate and search for opportunities in which they can continually sharpen their skills. In other words, teachability is a critical skill for new tech hires.

The Ability to Be Taught

Teachability is essentially a quick learning ability that allows talent to remain agile and flexible in an ever-changing business landscape. Teachability helps talent stay ahead of the curve and continually innovate, which naturally gives their employers a competitive advantage in the marketplace.

It also contributes to a new hire’s ability to apply constructive criticism, acknowledge their own mistakes, ask clarifying questions, and seek guidance when necessary. Without soft skills in tech, stagnation will set in quickly — even for an otherwise promising new hire, making the interview process all that more crucial.

Identifying Teachability in Candidates

Deciding how to assess soft skills in an interview is often easier said than done, as soft skills in tech — or any other industry, for that matter — aren’t usually as measurable or quantifiable as other skills.

Consider teachability, problem-solving, or quick learning ability; they don’t usually provide the same direct cause-and-effect outcomes as coding, programming, or regression analysis. As a result, companies must rely on a combination of tactics to determine the ideal recruit for a given role.

Making Sure to Assess Properly

Pre-employment assessments can definitely help by offering companies insights into whether candidates have the soft skills, temperament, and personality traits needed to succeed and contribute to the team.

Assessments also have a way of eliminating some of the trial and error –– as well as inherent biases –– that can occur during the interview process. With a bit of exploration, you can learn more about the potential hire and determine whether they have the desire to learn and grow as a professional.

Uncovering Evidence of Quick Learning Ability

As with almost anything in the screening and interview process, pre-employment assessments can tell you a lot about talent, but not everything. It’s also essential to ask for anecdotal evidence of how the candidate has used a soft skill like teachability in a previous position.

Companies are looking for specifics, so it’s vital to be specific with interview questions about learning new skills. The goal here is to leave little room for waffling.

Gauging a Canditdate’s True Interest

Beyond work examples, companies can also inquire about what news candidates keep up with or what soft skills they’ve recently added to their arsenal. These, too, can greatly assist in gauging talent’s desire to learn.

If a candidate isn’t interested in what’s going on in the field, then that person may not be as teachable as what their resume or answers to other interview questions may suggest.

Supporting Teachability in Technology

Offering professional development opportunities is the most obvious and effective way to cultivate teachability, but not all companies meet the standards that today’s fast-moving world requires.

A Talent Transformation Global Impact Report revealed only 45% of employees are “completely or very satisfied” with the available L&D programs in their field — meanwhile, 80% of companies believe their programs to be at least moderately successful. The solution is to allocate more time and money and encourage talent to take advantage of learning and development.

Incentivizing Those Who Excel

Additionally, leadership should take a critical view of the company’s promotion and development process to reward and recognize employees who go above and beyond when growing their skills.

After all, growing competence within a professional field should be acknowledged and recognized appropriately to retain quality talent, especially when that same report found that 44% of companies say employee turnover has hindered their ability to achieve goals.

Making the Right Choice in Talent and Talent Development

When hiring new talent in the tech field, you need recruits with a growth mindset. They also need a teachable attitude to continue learning along with quickly advancing technology. Finding teachable talent is only the first part of the greater hiring equation.

The rest often requires companies to think differently about where they source talent and commit to professional development for talent on-the-job, which is beneficial for employee and company growth. Hiring for teachability and cultivating it can bring your company into the modern age, support the adoption of new tech, and (most importantly) help sharpen your competitive edge.

Crystal Crump

Managing Director of Company Relations at LaunchCode

Crystal Crump is the Managing Director of Company Relations at LaunchCode. She helps individuals gain access to tech careers by partnering with business leaders to achieve recruitment and workforce development initiatives.

Continue Reading

Politics

Best Hoka Shoes of 2023

Published

10 hours ago

on

05/28/2023

By

HOKA ONE ONE Clifton 8 Womens Shoes


Selecting the right pair of shoes is crucial for achieving optimal performance and comfort during any physical activity. HOKA is a popular brand known for producing shoes with maximal cushioning, making them ideal for runners and other athletes seeking to reduce the impact on their joints. In this article, we will compare and contrast several HOKA ONE ONE shoe models for both men and women, highlighting their key features and benefits.

Expert Review Process

Expert reviews of HOKA ONE ONE shoes typically involve a detailed assessment of the shoes’ design, materials, and performance, as well as an evaluation of their fit and comfort. This may involve running or walking in the shoes, testing them on various surfaces, and comparing them to other shoe models in the same category.

Experts may also take into account feedback from consumers and other athletes, as well as industry trends and advancements in footwear technology. They may evaluate the shoes based on factors such as cushioning, stability, breathability, and support, as well as their overall value for the price.

In addition to evaluating individual shoe models, experts may also provide broader insights into the HOKA ONE ONE brand as a whole, highlighting its history, values, and commitment to innovation in footwear design.

Ultimately, the expert review process of HOKA ONE ONE shoes aims to provide consumers with a comprehensive and unbiased assessment of the shoes’ strengths and weaknesses, helping them make informed decisions when choosing the right pair of shoes for their needs.

HOKA ONE ONE Clifton 8 Womens Shoes

 

The HOKA ONE ONE Clifton 8 Women’s Shoes offer an incredibly comfortable and lightweight running experience, earning a solid 4.5 out of 5 rating.

Key Stats

  • Weight: 7.2 oz (Women’s size 7)
  • Stack height: 29mm (heel), 24mm (forefoot)
  • Drop: 5mm

Should You Buy?

Reasons to buy the HOKA ONE ONE Clifton 8 Women’s Shoes include their exceptional cushioning, which provides a smooth and responsive ride for all types of runners. The redesigned mesh upper offers enhanced breathability, ensuring your feet stay cool during long runs. The shoe also features a more durable outsole, resulting in a longer-lasting shoe that continues delivering first-class performance mile after mile.

However, there are also reasons to consider not purchasing the Clifton 8. Some users may find the price point to be on the higher side, or the thick cushioning may not suit runners who prefer a more minimalist or closer-to-ground feel. Additionally, the wider fit may not adequately support those with very narrow feet or require a more secure lock-down.

Pros and Cons

In summary, the HOKA ONE ONE Clifton 8 Women’s Shoes provide an excellent combination of cushioning, lightweight, and durability. Pros include the shoe’s outstanding comfort, responsive performance, and breathability, while potential cons for some users are the price, thicker cushioning, and wider fit.

 

HOKA ONE ONE Bondi 8 Mens Shoes

 

The HOKA ONE ONE Bondi 8 Mens Shoes deliver unparalleled cushioning, support, and comfort, earning a well-deserved rating of 4.5 out of 5.

Key Stats

– Midsole: Full-length compression-molded EVA foam
– Outsole: Durable rubber with strategically placed carbon rubber for added durability
– Weight: 10.9 oz (US size 9)

Should You Buy?

The HOKA ONE ONE Bondi 8 Mens Shoes are perfect for those seeking exceptional cushioning and support for various activities like running, walking, or standing for long hours. Its full-length EVA midsole provides outstanding shock absorption, reducing the stress on your joints and feet. The shoe’s Meta-Rocker technology promotes a natural, efficient gait, while its breathable upper ensures comfortable, well-ventilated wear. Durable construction and materials mean that these shoes are built to last, providing fantastic value for money.

Some customers might find the HOKA ONE ONE Bondi 8 Mens Shoes too bulky or heavy, especially for fast or nimble training. For people with narrower feet, the wider toe box may lead to an uncomfortable fit. The shoe’s premium features and materials also come at a higher price point, which might not suit budget-conscious consumers.

Pros and Cons

Pros:
– Unmatched cushioning and support
– Versatile for various activities
– Durable construction and materials
– Breathable upper

Cons:
– Bulky and heavier compared to other models
– Wide toe box might be too spacious for some
– Higher price point

HOKA ONE ONE Bondi 7 Womens Shoes

 

The HOKA ONE ONE Bondi 7 Women’s Shoes deliver exceptional comfort and support for everyday runners, earning a solid 4.5 out of 5 stars.

Key Stats

– Ultra-cushioned EVA midsole
– Engineered mesh upper for breathability
– Beveled heel design for smooth transitions

These shoes are perfect for those seeking maximum cushioning and support, making them ideal for long runs or daily wear. The Bondi 7 features a comfortable EVA midsole, providing excellent shock absorption and a plush underfoot feel. The engineered mesh upper offers breathability, ensuring your feet stay cool and dry throughout your run. Additionally, the beveled heel aids in smooth and stable transitions, making these shoes an excellent choice for improving your running experience.

On the downside, the HOKA ONE ONE Bondi 7 may not be suitable for those in search of a lightweight or minimalistic running shoe, as the shoe delivers a more substantial feel on-foot. Moreover, these shoes might be too cushioned for some, potentially leading to less ground feel and responsiveness during faster-paced runs or more technical terrain.

Pros and Cons

Pros and Cons: The HOKA ONE ONE Bondi 7 Women’s Shoes offer immense cushioning and support, ideal for long runs and everyday wear. The breathable mesh upper and beveled heel design adds to the shoe’s overall comfort and performance. However, it may not be the best option for those seeking a lightweight, minimalistic shoe or those desiring more ground feel and responsiveness.

HOKA ONE ONE Women's Low-top Sneaker

 

The HOKA ONE ONE Women’s Low-top Sneaker is a top-notch sports shoe designed for women seeking comfort, support, and style, earning a solid 4.5 out of 5 rating.

Key Stats

• Weight: 9.95 oz / 282 g
• Stack Height: 27 mm (heel), 22 mm (forefoot)
• Material: Mesh upper, rubber outsole

Should You Buy?

Reasons to buy the HOKA ONE ONE Women’s Low-top Sneaker include its amazing cushioning that provides ample support for long walks or runs. The lightweight design doesn’t compromise on durability, ensuring that you get efficient performance without feeling weighed down. With its stylish appearance and wide range of color options, you will surely find one that matches your personal taste.

On the other hand, some customers may not appreciate the slightly higher price point compared to other brands. Additionally, the shoe’s unique design may not provide the snug fit that some individuals prefer in their athletic footwear.

Pros and Cons

In conclusion, the HOKA ONE ONE Women’s Low-top Sneaker has its pros like excellent cushioning, lightweight design, and stylish appearance, making it an attractive option for those who value comfort and support during physical activities. On the other hand, the cons include a somewhat higher price point and a potentially less-snug fit for certain users.

Hoka Women's Gaviota 4 Shoes

 

The HOKA ONE ONE Women’s Bondi 7 Running Shoe is a top-of-the-line running shoe offering excellent cushioning and stability with a stylish, sleek design, deserving a rating of 4.5 out of 5.

Key Stats

Cushion: Plush, full-length EVA midsole
• Weight: 8.9oz (251.72g)
• Drop: 4mm

Should You Buy?

Reasons to buy the HOKA ONE ONE Women’s Bondi 7 Running Shoe are numerous. With a plush full-length EVA midsole, this shoe offers supreme comfort for extended periods of wear, making it perfect for long runs and extended workouts. The Bondi 7 also provides excellent stability and support due to its smoother transitions and balanced Meta-Rocker. The shoe’s stylish design and variety of color options further make it an attractive option for individuals who prioritize both form and function in their athletic footwear.

While the Bondi 7 Running Shoe has many positive attributes, there are still a few reasons to consider other options. For one, the weight of the shoe at 8.9 ounces could potentially feel heavy for some runners who prefer a more minimalist shoe. Additionally, the price point of the Bondi 7 is comparatively high, which may deter budget-conscious consumers.

Pros and Cons

In conclusion, the HOKA ONE ONE Women’s Bondi 7 Running Shoe is an excellent choice for individuals seeking a comfortable, stable, and stylish running shoe. Pros of the Bondi 7 include its plush cushioning, excellent stability, and variety of color options. However, potential cons include the shoe’s weight and its higher price point compared to other running shoe options.

 

HOKA ONE ONE Women's Bondi 7 Running Shoe

 

The Hoka Women’s Stinson 6 Shoes provide maximal cushioning and a comfortable ride, earning a solid rating of 4.5 out of 5 stars.

Key Stats

• Weight: 10.2 oz (289 grams)
• Stack Height: 37mm (heel), 32mm (forefoot)
• Category: Maximal Cushioning Road Running Shoe

Should You Buy?

The Hoka Women’s Stinson 6 Shoes are an excellent choice for runners seeking plush cushioning and a smooth ride. The thick EVA foam midsole delivers exceptional shock absorption, making it suitable for long runs and recovery days. The engineered mesh upper ensures proper breathability, while the Meta-Rocker technology encourages a natural and efficient running gait. The Stinson 6 also features a durable outsole, allowing for reliable traction on various surfaces.

Some potential drawbacks of the Hoka Women’s Stinson 6 Shoes include its heavier weight, which might not appeal to faster runners or those looking for a more lightweight and agile shoe. The maximal cushioning might also feel excessive for runners who are used to low-profile or minimalist shoes. Finally, the shoe’s price tag could be a deterrent for budget-conscious buyers.

Pros and Cons

Pros:
• Maximum cushioning for excellent comfort and shock absorption
• Meta-Rocker technology to promote an efficient running gait
• Breathable and comfortable upper
Cons:
• Heavier weight compared to other running shoes
• Excessive cushioning may not suit all runners’ preferences
• Higher price point

Hoka Women's Stinson 6 Shoes

 

The Hoka One Men’s Running Shoes are an exceptional blend of cushioning, support, and performance, earning a 4.5 out of 5-star rating.

Key Stats

– Weight: 10.3 oz (292 g) for men’s size 9
– Heel-to-toe drop: 4mm (32mm heel, 28mm forefoot)
– Price range: $130-$200

Should You Buy?

The Hoka One Men’s Running Shoes provide runners with excellent cushioning without being overly bulky, making them suitable for a variety of running activities. Their unique rocker-shaped sole promotes a smooth and efficient running stride, reducing the impact on joints and muscles.

The shoes also offer exceptional stability and support, making them ideal for runners who may struggle with overpronation or other gait-related issues. Lastly, these shoes offer excellent value for their price range as they boast a good balance of comfort, durability, and performance.

Although the Hoka One Men’s Running Shoes excel in cushioning and support, they may feel too maximalist or heavy for some runners who prefer a more minimal or lightweight option. Additionally, the shoe’s unique design can require a period of adjustment, as it might not suit everyone’s running style or gait right away. Lastly, some customers have reported durability issues with the upper material, which may require more frequent replacements than other shoes at a similar price point.

Pros and Cons

Pros:
– Excellent cushioning and support
– Unique rocker-shaped sole for a smooth stride
– Suitable for various running activities
– Good value for the price range

Cons:
– May be too maximalist or heavy for some runners
– Adjustment period for those unfamiliar with Hoka shoes
– Potential durability issues with upper material

 

Hoka One Men's Running Shoes

 

The Hoka One Men’s Running Shoes are an exceptional blend of cushioning, support, and performance, earning a 4.5 out of 5-star rating.

Key Stats

– Weight: 10.3 oz (292 g) for men’s size 9
– Heel-to-toe drop: 4mm (32mm heel, 28mm forefoot)
– Price range: $130-$200

Should You Buy?

The Hoka One Men’s Running Shoes provide runners with excellent cushioning without being overly bulky, making them suitable for various running activities. Their unique rocker-shaped sole promotes a smooth and efficient running stride, reducing the impact on joints and muscles. The shoes also offer exceptional stability and support, making them ideal for runners struggling with overpronation or other gait-related issues. Lastly, these shoes offer excellent value for their price range as they boast a good balance of comfort, durability, and performance.

Although the Hoka One Men’s Running Shoes excel in cushioning and support, they may feel too maximalist or heavy for some runners who prefer a more minimal or lightweight option. Additionally, the shoe’s unique design can require a period of adjustment, as it might not suit everyone’s running style or gait right away. Lastly, some customers have reported durability issues with the upper material, which may require more frequent replacements than other shoes at a similar price point.

Pros and Cons

Pros:
– Excellent cushioning and support
– Unique rocker-shaped sole for a smooth stride
– Suitable for various running activities
– Good value for the price range

Cons:
– May be too maximalist or heavy for some runners
– Adjustment period for those unfamiliar with Hoka shoes
– Potential durability issues with upper material

HOKA ONE ONE Mens Speedgoat 4 Textile Synthetic Trainers

 

The HOKA ONE ONE Men’s Speedgoat 4 Textile Synthetic Trainers excel in comfort and durability, earning a solid 4.5 out of 5 stars.

Key Stats

– Cushioning: Exceptional with responsive EVA midsole
– Traction: Multi-directional Vibram Megagrip outsole
– Fit: Secure with breathable, lightweight upper material

Should You Buy?

If you’re a trail runner seeking a comfortable, durable, and grippy shoe for various terrains, the Speedgoat 4 is an excellent choice. This shoe features a responsive EVA midsole, providing ample cushioning for long runs or hikes. The Vibram Megagrip outsole offers outstanding traction on diverse surfaces, while the synthetic textile upper ensures a secure fit without compromising breathability or weight. Overall, this shoe is a reliable option for outdoor enthusiasts seeking a high-performance trainer.

While the Speedgoat 4 has many positives, it might not be the perfect fit for everybody. Its maximal cushioning may dissuade those who prefer a more minimalist, ground-feel shoe. Additionally, the shoe may run narrow for some individuals, proving problematic for those with wider feet. Lastly, the price point might deter budget-conscious shoppers who are not ready to invest in premium footwear just yet.

Pros and Cons

Pros: Excellent cushioning, exceptional traction, secure fit, lightweight, breathable
Cons: May not suit minimalist preferences, potentially narrow fit, higher price point

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

What is the difference between maximal and moderate cushioning in HOKA ONE ONE shoes?

Maximal cushioning provides more cushioning and support, making it ideal for runners who want to reduce the impact on their joints. Moderate cushioning, on the other hand, provides a balance between cushioning and responsiveness, making it suitable for a variety of physical activities.

Are HOKA ONE ONE shoes only for running?

No, HOKA ONE ONE offers a range of shoes suitable for a variety of physical activities, including trail running, hiking, and casual wear.

How do I choose the right size of HOKA ONE ONE shoes?

It is recommended to measure your foot size and consult the HOKA ONE ONE size chart to determine the appropriate size for you. Additionally, it is recommended to try on the shoes and walk or run in them to ensure a proper fit.

Are HOKA ONE ONE shoes durable?

Yes, HOKA ONE ONE shoes are known for their durability, with many models featuring durable materials and reinforced designs.

Can HOKA ONE ONE shoes be used for high-intensity training?

Yes, some HOKA ONE ONE models, such as the Bondi and Clifton, are suitable for high-intensity training due to their responsive and supportive design. However, it is recommended to choose a shoe model that is specifically designed for the type of activity you plan to engage in.

Conclusion

In conclusion, HOKA offers a range of shoe models with different cushioning levels and designs to cater to the needs of various athletes. The Clifton 8, Bondi 8, and Rincon 3 are ideal for road running, while the Stinson 6 and Bondi 7 are suitable for trail running. Additionally, the brand’s low-top sneakers offer a comfortable and casual option for everyday wear.

Whether you’re a seasoned runner or simply seeking a comfortable pair of shoes for daily wear, HOKA ONE ONE has a shoe model to suit your needs. By considering the features and benefits of each shoe model, you can make an informed decision and choose the perfect pair of shoes for your fitness journey.

Deanna Ritchie

Managing Editor at ReadWrite

Deanna is the Managing Editor at ReadWrite. Previously she worked as the Editor in Chief for Startup Grind and has over 20+ years of experience in content management and content development.

Continue Reading

Politics

Crypto Trading and Its Impact: Understanding the World of Cryptocurrency

Published

16 hours ago

on

05/27/2023

By

Deanna Ritchie


Cryptocurrency has gained significant attention and popularity in recent years. With its decentralized nature and potential for high returns, crypto trading has become a subject of interest for investors and individuals seeking new opportunities. In this article, we will explore the world of crypto trading, its impact on the economy, and the factors that contribute to its volatility. By understanding the intricacies of crypto trading, you can make informed decisions and navigate this dynamic market.

Introduction

Cryptocurrency, a digital or virtual form of currency, operates on a technology called blockchain. It offers secure, peer-to-peer transactions without the need for intermediaries like banks. Crypto trading refers to the act of speculating on the price movements of cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, Ethereum, or others. Traders buy these digital assets at a low price, hold onto them, and sell when the price rises, aiming to generate profits. Before delving into the impact of crypto trading, it is essential to gain a thorough understanding of this realm.

Understanding Cryptocurrency and Crypto Trading

Cryptocurrency operates on decentralized networks, making it resistant to censorship and manipulation. It utilizes cryptographic techniques to secure transactions and control the creation of new units. Unlike traditional currencies, cryptocurrencies are not regulated by central authorities or influenced by monetary policies, inflation, or economic growth. This decentralized nature allows for peer-to-peer transactions and removes the need for intermediaries like banks. Additionally, the rise of cryptocurrency has paved the way for various online platforms that enable betting online, providing individuals with an opportunity to participate in this innovative financial ecosystem and potentially profit from price fluctuations.

Volatility and Risk in Crypto Trading

One of the defining characteristics of the crypto market is its volatility. Cryptocurrencies can experience substantial price swings within short periods, presenting both opportunities and risks. The rapid changes in prices can lead to significant gains or losses for traders. It is crucial to acknowledge the inherent volatility and implement risk management strategies while engaging in crypto trading. Without proper risk management, traders may face significant losses.

Economic Impact of Crypto Trading

The economic impact of cryptocurrency extends beyond individual trading activities. As the crypto market continues to grow, it garners attention from economists and investors alike. Cryptocurrencies have the potential to disrupt traditional financial systems and offer new possibilities for global transactions, remittances, and decentralized applications. The value of a cryptocurrency can be influenced by factors such as supply and demand dynamics, technological advancements, regulatory changes, and market sentiment. The rise of cryptocurrencies has sparked debates among economists and policymakers regarding its potential long-term effects on the global economy.

Advantages and Disadvantages of Crypto Trading

Crypto trading presents various advantages for participants. Firstly, the crypto market offers high liquidity, allowing traders to buy and sell assets quickly without significant price impact. Additionally, the crypto market operates 24/7, enabling traders from different time zones to engage at their convenience. Moreover, the potential for substantial returns attracts many individuals to explore this alternative investment avenue. However, it is important to acknowledge the potential disadvantages of crypto trading. Market manipulation, regulatory uncertainties, and the risk of cybersecurity breaches are some of the challenges that traders may face. Therefore, conducting thorough research, staying updated on market news, and understanding the risks are crucial for successful crypto trading.

Technical Analysis in Crypto Trading

Technical analysis is a widely used tool in the crypto market. It involves analyzing historical price data and market trends to predict future price movements. Traders utilize various indicators, chart patterns, and statistical models to identify potential trading opportunities and manage risk. Technical analysis provides valuable insights into market trends and patterns, especially in a highly volatile and dynamic market like cryptocurrency. By studying price charts and utilizing technical analysis tools, traders can make more informed decisions and potentially improve their trading strategies.

High-Frequency Crypto Trading

High-frequency crypto trading refers to executing a large number of trades within short timeframes. Traders aim to capitalize on small price discrepancies across different exchanges by making rapid buy-and-sell transactions. This strategy relies on advanced technology and algorithms to automate trading decisions and execute trades quickly. While high-frequency trading can potentially generate profits, it requires substantial capital, advanced technology, and expertise. Traders should also consider the risks involved, such as technical glitches, market manipulation, and regulatory challenges. Therefore, high-frequency trading is typically more suitable for experienced traders who have the necessary resources and expertise.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the world of cryptocurrency and crypto trading presents both opportunities and challenges for individuals seeking alternative financial avenues. Understanding the decentralized nature of cryptocurrency and the cryptographic techniques it utilizes is essential in grasping the potential of this digital asset class. Crypto trading allows individuals to participate in this innovative financial ecosystem and potentially profit from price fluctuations. However, it is crucial to acknowledge the inherent volatility and risks associated with the crypto market. Implementing risk management strategies, conducting thorough research, and staying informed are vital for success in crypto trading.

The economic impact of cryptocurrency extends beyond individual trading activities. With the potential to disrupt traditional financial systems, cryptocurrencies offer new possibilities for global transactions and decentralized applications. Economists and investors closely monitor the development of cryptocurrencies and their effects on the global economy. While crypto trading provides advantages such as high liquidity, accessibility, and the potential for substantial returns, it is important to be aware of the potential disadvantages, including market manipulation, regulatory uncertainties, and cybersecurity risks. Traders must approach the crypto market cautiously, conducting thorough due diligence and understanding the associated risks.

Technical Analysis

Technical analysis plays a significant role in crypto trading by providing insights into market trends and patterns. Traders can utilize various technical analysis tools to identify potential trading opportunities and manage risk effectively. However, it is crucial to note that technical analysis should be used in conjunction with other fundamental and market analysis techniques, as it is not foolproof. High-frequency crypto trading, though potentially profitable, requires substantial capital, advanced technology, and expertise. It is a strategy more suitable for experienced traders who can navigate the associated risks and challenges.

To succeed in crypto trading, continuous learning, adaptability, and staying updated with the latest developments are key. The crypto market is ever-evolving, presenting both new opportunities and challenges. By approaching crypto trading with caution, conducting thorough research, and maintaining a comprehensive understanding of market dynamics, individuals can navigate this dynamic landscape and potentially benefit from the opportunities it offers.

Deanna Ritchie

Managing Editor at ReadWrite

Deanna is the Managing Editor at ReadWrite. Previously she worked as the Editor in Chief for Startup Grind and has over 20+ years of experience in content management and content development.

Continue Reading

Copyright © 2021 Seminole Press.