Connect with us

Politics

Is Crowdfunding for Startups a Good Idea?

Published

on

Is Crowdfunding for Startups a Good Idea?


From paying attention to fees to balancing what works for you, here are 13 answers to the question, “Is crowdfunding for startups a good idea? Why or why not?”

  • No, High Transaction Fees
  • No, Too Many Lenders
  • No, Beware the Double-Edged Sword
  • Yes, but Look for Restrictions
  • Yes, but Not for Everyone
  • Yes, but as Part of a Broader Fundraising Strategy
  • No, Too Distracting and Saturated
  • Yes, for Marketing and PR
  • Yes, for Initial Verification
  • Yes, to See if Your Product Will Sell
  • Yes, to Attract Early Adopters
  • Yes, for Raising Capital, Creating Content, Rewards, and Autonomy
  • Yes, but Weigh the Pros and Cons

No, High Transaction Fees

Crowdfunding platforms charge fees for their services, which can range from 5% to 10% of the total funds raised, which eats into the amount of capital that the startup receives at the end of the campaign. These fees are charged to cover the costs of operating the crowdfunding platform, including marketing, payment processing, and customer support.

While these fees may seem reasonable at first glance, they can add up quickly and significantly impact the amount of capital that the startup receives from the crowdfunding campaign. Additionally, some crowdfunding platforms may charge additional fees for certain services, including offering marketing and admin support.

Joe Flanagan, Founder, 90s Fashion World

No, Too Many Lenders

While the idea of sourcing capital from multiple smaller sources is an enticing one, the reality is far less pleasant. Too many lenders to keep track of makes it hard to manage the various people who have a stake in your venture and their different expectations.

In addition, there can be uncertainty over how much capital one will actually generate, as getting all these individual stakeholders on board can be a difficult task. All in all, while crowdfunding can provide alternative sources of startup funding, its immense workload and unreliable returns make it an unappealing option to explore.

Lorien Strydom, Executive Country Manager, Financer.com

No, Beware the Double-Edged Sword 

Crowdfunding is a double-edged sword because of its public nature. A campaign should only be used if your product has a “viral” quality to it. The crowdfunding act itself becomes a marketing strategy. The interest in it is quantifiable, proof that there is interest in the idea.

On the other hand, failing to raise the desired funds proves its limitations in the marketplace. Many startup ideas can be unnecessarily set back in the eyes of other investors if the crowdfunding attempt goes sideways.

Bridget Reed, Co-founder and VP of Content, The Word Counter

Yes, but Look for Restrictions

Crowdfunding is an efficient and cost-effective way to raise money to finance the development of a startup. With crowdfunding, startups have access to a large pool of potential investors to help fund their projects with relatively low fees and minimal risk. It also allows entrepreneurs to create awareness around their product or service and provides an opportunity to engage a larger audience of potential customers.

On the other hand, crowdfunding can also be risky for startups. There is no guarantee that investors will come through with their promised money, and it can be difficult to project how much money you will actually raise. Additionally, some types of crowdfunding campaigns require up-front expenses, and it can take a long time to see a return on investment.

Some platforms have strict regulations regarding what types of projects and products can be listed on the site, so startups might not always be able to get approval for their campaigns.

Michael Dadashi, CEO of Infinite Recovery

Yes, but Not for Everyone

Crowdfunding is a great way to connect with potential clients before launch. Startups can gain many enthusiastic followers who can invest their money and contribute to the business’s success. Therefore, they will likely be more emotionally invested in the startup’s success.

However, crowdfunding is not for everyone. It’s a great starting point if you’re not established enough to gain capital from large investors, but it can be very time-consuming, as you essentially need to create a complete marketing and investing campaign that requires constant nurturing to see success from it.

Inbar Madar, Founder and Business Consultant, M.I. Business Consulting

Yes, but as Part of a Broader Fundraising Strategy

Crowdfunding‌ is best seen as a component of a more comprehensive fundraising approach for new businesses. While it can be a beneficial tool for raising funds and developing a community of supporters, it should not be a startup’s exclusive source of funding.

Founders should consider other fundraising possibilities, such as traditional venture capital or angel investment, as well as non-dilutive funding sources such as grants or loans. By broadening their fundraising efforts, founders can enhance their odds of success and ensure they have the resources they need to develop a successful business.

Tiffany Hafler, Marketing Coordinator, Blockchain Lawyer

No, Too Distracting and Saturated

Despite the advantages of crowdfunding, I believe there are also potential drawbacks to consider. One drawback is that crowdfunding campaigns can be time-consuming and distracting, diverting attention away from genuine business development.

Furthermore, a failed crowdfunding campaign can be depressing for the founder and make future capital raising more difficult. Another major issue with crowdfunding is that standing out in a crowded marketplace can be tough.

There are many crowdfunding campaigns competing for attention, and getting noticed and attracting backers can be difficult. Furthermore, crowdfunding can be a very public process, making it difficult to keep corporate information private.

Gerrid Smith, Communications Manager, Property Tax Loan Pros

Yes, for Marketing and PR

Crowdfunding efforts‌ have the potential to be a useful resource for business owners who wish to increase interest in and visibility for their product or service by soliciting monetary contributions from a large number of people.

Through crowdfunding campaigns, new businesses can connect with potential customers and backers who are interested in their product or service and can offer valuable feedback and assistance in spreading the word.

Dean Lee, Head of E-commerce, 88Vape

Yes, for Initial Verification

Crowdfunding campaigns‌ may be a great way for new businesses to get early feedback on their products or services. Also, they can learn about the interest of the market and get constructive criticism from backers.

However, they are time-consuming. Planning, launching, and managing successful crowdfunding projects take a lot of time and energy. Making an engaging pitch, creating prizes, and managing the campaign’s logistics can take a lot of work.

Sasha Quail, Business Development Manager, claims.co.uk

Yes, to See if Your Product Will Sell

In the future, you will probably have to deal with traditional investors. Nonetheless, a successful crowdfunding campaign might act as a portfolio to show to potential investors. You’ll need to prove your company’s viability in the marketplace before investors will risk money on it. At the trial-and-error phase of an idea’s development, this is a significant challenge.

Crowdfunding might be used to develop a solid prototype, which will aid in building trust and credibility with them. Isn’t this a little too soon to tell? That’s great, too; consider your crowdfunding campaign a scientific experiment. Before investing time or money, you can gauge the level of interest and willingness to pay for your ideas. If you cannot raise enough money through crowdfunding, it may be time to reevaluate your business concept.

Mathew Bowley, Head of Marketing, Solmar Villas

Yes, to Attract Early Adopters

It’s impossible to overstate the importance of early adopters, who will be the driving force behind your company’s expansion into the mainstream thanks to their dedication and enthusiasm for your company’s vision and values.

It’s not always simple to discover such devoted patrons and promoters. This group represents those who believe in your ability to achieve your goals and will put their money where their mouth is by investing in your business. They’re the first to tell their friends and family about you, to promote you online and in person, and to cheer you on at every turn.

This is a tremendous perk of crowdsourcing that should not be ignored. Your campaign is a golden opportunity to introduce your brand’s values, history, stories, and plans to people who might become passionate champions. It can serve as a centralized hub for distributing all of your most important information. Forgoing one is like throwing away money.

Shakzod Khabibov, Founder, Natura Market

Yes, for Raising Capital, Creating Content, Rewards, and Autonomy

Crowdfunding for startups can be a great way to raise capital without requiring a large loan from a bank or outside investor.

For example, artists on Patreon can solicit members of their fan base to donate in appreciation and support of their work going forward. This allows them to continue creating content and often even generate revenue for living expenses without begging for money at each individual show or only relying upon royalty payments from music sales when available.

Depending upon the platform, it is also possible to provide rewards such as merchandise bundles, early access to albums, or even one-on-one experiences with the creators of these projects, based on set tiers of contributions. As long as there is enough interest accrued towards meeting goal targets, startup crowdfunding can offer a much better route than traditional means while potentially allowing companies more autonomy and control over how they manage their project funding.

Amy Ling Lin, CEO, Sundays

Yes, but Weigh the Pros and Cons

Crowdfunding has become a popular alternative to traditional fundraising methods for startups. It involves raising small amounts of money from many individuals through online platforms:

Pros:

  • Access to Capital: Crowdfunding can provide startups with access to capital that may be difficult to obtain through traditional methods such as bank loans or venture capital.
  • Customer Validation: Crowdfunding can serve as a way to validate a startup’s product or idea by gauging interest and support from potential customers.

Cons:

  • Time-Consuming: Crowdfunding campaigns can be time-consuming and require significant effort to prepare and promote the campaign. This can divert resources and focus away from other critical business activities.
  • Limited Funding: Crowdfunding campaigns may not always generate enough funding to meet a startup’s financial needs. In some cases, startups may need to turn to additional fundraising methods to secure enough capital to grow their business.

Published First on GritDaily. Read Here.

Featured Image Credit: Photo by RF._.studio; Pexels; Thank you!

Politics

Fintech Kennek raises $12.5M seed round to digitize lending

Published

on

Google eyed for $2 billion Anthropic deal after major Amazon play


London-based fintech startup Kennek has raised $12.5 million in seed funding to expand its lending operating system.

According to an Oct. 10 tech.eu report, the round was led by HV Capital and included participation from Dutch Founders Fund, AlbionVC, FFVC, Plug & Play Ventures, and Syndicate One. Kennek offers software-as-a-service tools to help non-bank lenders streamline their operations using open banking, open finance, and payments.

The platform aims to automate time-consuming manual tasks and consolidate fragmented data to simplify lending. Xavier De Pauw, founder of Kennek said:

“Until kennek, lenders had to devote countless hours to menial operational tasks and deal with jumbled and hard-coded data – which makes every other part of lending a headache. As former lenders ourselves, we lived and breathed these frustrations, and built kennek to make them a thing of the past.”

The company said the latest funding round was oversubscribed and closed quickly despite the challenging fundraising environment. The new capital will be used to expand Kennek’s engineering team and strengthen its market position in the UK while exploring expansion into other European markets. Barbod Namini, Partner at lead investor HV Capital, commented on the investment:

“Kennek has developed an ambitious and genuinely unique proposition which we think can be the foundation of the entire alternative lending space. […] It is a complicated market and a solution that brings together all information and stakeholders onto a single platform is highly compelling for both lenders & the ecosystem as a whole.”

The fintech lending space has grown rapidly in recent years, but many lenders still rely on legacy systems and manual processes that limit efficiency and scalability. Kennek aims to leverage open banking and data integration to provide lenders with a more streamlined, automated lending experience.

The seed funding will allow the London-based startup to continue developing its platform and expanding its team to meet demand from non-bank lenders looking to digitize operations. Kennek’s focus on the UK and Europe also comes amid rising adoption of open banking and open finance in the regions.

Featured Image Credit: Photo from Kennek.io; Thank you!

Radek Zielinski

Radek Zielinski is an experienced technology and financial journalist with a passion for cybersecurity and futurology.

Continue Reading

Politics

Fortune 500’s race for generative AI breakthroughs

Published

on

Deanna Ritchie


As excitement around generative AI grows, Fortune 500 companies, including Goldman Sachs, are carefully examining the possible applications of this technology. A recent survey of U.S. executives indicated that 60% believe generative AI will substantially impact their businesses in the long term. However, they anticipate a one to two-year timeframe before implementing their initial solutions. This optimism stems from the potential of generative AI to revolutionize various aspects of businesses, from enhancing customer experiences to optimizing internal processes. In the short term, companies will likely focus on pilot projects and experimentation, gradually integrating generative AI into their operations as they witness its positive influence on efficiency and profitability.

Goldman Sachs’ Cautious Approach to Implementing Generative AI

In a recent interview, Goldman Sachs CIO Marco Argenti revealed that the firm has not yet implemented any generative AI use cases. Instead, the company focuses on experimentation and setting high standards before adopting the technology. Argenti recognized the desire for outcomes in areas like developer and operational efficiency but emphasized ensuring precision before putting experimental AI use cases into production.

According to Argenti, striking the right balance between driving innovation and maintaining accuracy is crucial for successfully integrating generative AI within the firm. Goldman Sachs intends to continue exploring this emerging technology’s potential benefits and applications while diligently assessing risks to ensure it meets the company’s stringent quality standards.

One possible application for Goldman Sachs is in software development, where the company has observed a 20-40% productivity increase during its trials. The goal is for 1,000 developers to utilize generative AI tools by year’s end. However, Argenti emphasized that a well-defined expectation of return on investment is necessary before fully integrating generative AI into production.

To achieve this, the company plans to implement a systematic and strategic approach to adopting generative AI, ensuring that it complements and enhances the skills of its developers. Additionally, Goldman Sachs intends to evaluate the long-term impact of generative AI on their software development processes and the overall quality of the applications being developed.

Goldman Sachs’ approach to AI implementation goes beyond merely executing models. The firm has created a platform encompassing technical, legal, and compliance assessments to filter out improper content and keep track of all interactions. This comprehensive system ensures seamless integration of artificial intelligence in operations while adhering to regulatory standards and maintaining client confidentiality. Moreover, the platform continuously improves and adapts its algorithms, allowing Goldman Sachs to stay at the forefront of technology and offer its clients the most efficient and secure services.

Featured Image Credit: Photo by Google DeepMind; Pexels; Thank you!

Deanna Ritchie

Managing Editor at ReadWrite

Deanna is the Managing Editor at ReadWrite. Previously she worked as the Editor in Chief for Startup Grind and has over 20+ years of experience in content management and content development.

Continue Reading

Politics

UK seizes web3 opportunity simplifying crypto regulations

Published

on

Deanna Ritchie


As Web3 companies increasingly consider leaving the United States due to regulatory ambiguity, the United Kingdom must simplify its cryptocurrency regulations to attract these businesses. The conservative think tank Policy Exchange recently released a report detailing ten suggestions for improving Web3 regulation in the country. Among the recommendations are reducing liability for token holders in decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) and encouraging the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) to adopt alternative Know Your Customer (KYC) methodologies, such as digital identities and blockchain analytics tools. These suggestions aim to position the UK as a hub for Web3 innovation and attract blockchain-based businesses looking for a more conducive regulatory environment.

Streamlining Cryptocurrency Regulations for Innovation

To make it easier for emerging Web3 companies to navigate existing legal frameworks and contribute to the UK’s digital economy growth, the government must streamline cryptocurrency regulations and adopt forward-looking approaches. By making the regulatory landscape clear and straightforward, the UK can create an environment that fosters innovation, growth, and competitiveness in the global fintech industry.

The Policy Exchange report also recommends not weakening self-hosted wallets or treating proof-of-stake (PoS) services as financial services. This approach aims to protect the fundamental principles of decentralization and user autonomy while strongly emphasizing security and regulatory compliance. By doing so, the UK can nurture an environment that encourages innovation and the continued growth of blockchain technology.

Despite recent strict measures by UK authorities, such as His Majesty’s Treasury and the FCA, toward the digital assets sector, the proposed changes in the Policy Exchange report strive to make the UK a more attractive location for Web3 enterprises. By adopting these suggestions, the UK can demonstrate its commitment to fostering innovation in the rapidly evolving blockchain and cryptocurrency industries while ensuring a robust and transparent regulatory environment.

The ongoing uncertainty surrounding cryptocurrency regulations in various countries has prompted Web3 companies to explore alternative jurisdictions with more precise legal frameworks. As the United States grapples with regulatory ambiguity, the United Kingdom can position itself as a hub for Web3 innovation by simplifying and streamlining its cryptocurrency regulations.

Featured Image Credit: Photo by Jonathan Borba; Pexels; Thank you!

Deanna Ritchie

Managing Editor at ReadWrite

Deanna is the Managing Editor at ReadWrite. Previously she worked as the Editor in Chief for Startup Grind and has over 20+ years of experience in content management and content development.

Continue Reading

Copyright © 2021 Seminole Press.