Connect with us

Politics

To Understand SaaS Costs, You Must Know What Goes Into It

Published

on

Where Does Your Software Company Go From Here?


The software as a service industry has become integral to how successful organizations run their business. SaaS has repeatedly proven useful, enabling businesses to manage accounting, procurement, risk management, and more from one cohesive platform. The result is organizational consistency that provides value to customers and gives companies a competitive market advantage.

The Wide SaaS Net is Hard to Calculate Cost and Value

SaaS pricing is a complex and challenging process that needs to consider several factors, including market segmentation, security, and IT infrastructure requirements.

Organizations in the SaaS business may struggle to correctly price their solutions and effectively communicate the reasons for those prices to prospective clients.

The Importance of Finding a Pricing Sweet Spot

In this industry, pricing is a delicate balancing act. Too low, and you risk overextending your resources. Too high, and you price yourself out of the competition. But the path to finding your pricing Goldilocks is far from simple and requires juggling many different considerations.

Customers, regulators, and competitors all play a role in SaaS pricing, as does the evolution of technology itself. Artificial intelligence, for example, is already changing the game in terms of what SaaS companies can offer and what clients are looking for. It’s not just these myriad factors that influence pricing either. Your particular priorities will be different depending on the pricing strategy you choose to pursue.

Common Pricing Strategies SaaS Companies Should Consider

While the most common strategy — and the one you’re already likely familiar with — is user-based pricing, it isn’t necessarily the best approach for your business. To ensure you’re making the right pricing decisions for your organization, you must get familiar with all the techniques you can pursue and the pros and cons of each.

1. Value-Based Pricing

This is a customer-centric approach used by companies such as Adobe and HootSuite. It bases the price on the value a solution brings to clients. Value-based pricing can highlight how you outshine your competitors regarding features and functionality and boost a client’s emotional attachment to your services. Value-based pricing can open the door to customers paying a premium for your products, leading to more significant profits.

However, if you choose to go this route, you must know that you’ll face increased competition in a smaller market. Since not everyone can afford the prices that come with a value-based model, you’ll have a smaller target audience — one that will be highly sought after, given their ability to pay higher prices.

2. Competition-Based Pricing

Popular among newer SaaS companies, competition-based pricing is exactly what it sounds like. It looks at what competitors charge for similar products and uses that as the basis for pricing decisions. By knowing what your competitors are charging, you’ll better understand where your product should stand in the market.

You can choose to match competitors’ prices or charge more and highlight where you go above and beyond. You might also want to go the other direction and undercut the competition’s pricing to aggressively build a customer base. The competition-based pricing strategy is less risky and more straightforward than other options, but it isn’t necessarily a good long-term solution. Make sure not to rely too much on what your competitors are charging. Otherwise, you might make the same mistakes they do while failing to differentiate yourself in the market.

3. Feature-Based Pricing

Feature-based pricing and value-based pricing are similar; they put a spotlight on the features your particular solution brings to the table. This à la carte approach also makes it easy for your clients to pay for only what they want, providing an efficient and budget-friendly alternative to subscription and usage-based models.

However, this strategy can be challenging to keep track of on a large scale, making the billing process somewhat of a convoluted nightmare for your business. You could end up either undercharging or overcharging customers. A feature-based approach also doesn’t necessarily communicate the full value of what you have to offer, potentially centering your business as a budget brand rather than a premium one.

Customers Need to Feel Like They’re Getting a Fair Price

Whatever pricing strategy you choose, it’s crucial never to forget how the customer feels about your pricing. If your clients think they’re not getting enough value out of what they’re paying, or if they’re paying for more features than they need, chances are you’ll end up with one less customer.

However, if you can strike the right balance between your business’s needs and your client’s desires, you’ll reach the right price point.

Featured Image Credit: Tima Miroshnichenko; Pexels; Thank you!

Vince Dawkins

President

Vince Dawkins, president and CEO of Enertia Software, graduated from North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University with a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering. Between 1998 and 2008, Vince worked with industry-leading organizations influencing engineering, IT, and enterprise resource planning solutions. In August 2008, Vince joined Enertia Software as a senior business analyst where he contributed to the design, development, and implementation of an enterprise application for upstream oil and gas producers. Since joining the Enertia Software team, Vince has been integral in nurturing the growth and development of the Enertia application into a resource currently used by over 150 leaders in the upstream oil and gas industry.

Politics

Fintech Kennek raises $12.5M seed round to digitize lending

Published

on

Google eyed for $2 billion Anthropic deal after major Amazon play


London-based fintech startup Kennek has raised $12.5 million in seed funding to expand its lending operating system.

According to an Oct. 10 tech.eu report, the round was led by HV Capital and included participation from Dutch Founders Fund, AlbionVC, FFVC, Plug & Play Ventures, and Syndicate One. Kennek offers software-as-a-service tools to help non-bank lenders streamline their operations using open banking, open finance, and payments.

The platform aims to automate time-consuming manual tasks and consolidate fragmented data to simplify lending. Xavier De Pauw, founder of Kennek said:

“Until kennek, lenders had to devote countless hours to menial operational tasks and deal with jumbled and hard-coded data – which makes every other part of lending a headache. As former lenders ourselves, we lived and breathed these frustrations, and built kennek to make them a thing of the past.”

The company said the latest funding round was oversubscribed and closed quickly despite the challenging fundraising environment. The new capital will be used to expand Kennek’s engineering team and strengthen its market position in the UK while exploring expansion into other European markets. Barbod Namini, Partner at lead investor HV Capital, commented on the investment:

“Kennek has developed an ambitious and genuinely unique proposition which we think can be the foundation of the entire alternative lending space. […] It is a complicated market and a solution that brings together all information and stakeholders onto a single platform is highly compelling for both lenders & the ecosystem as a whole.”

The fintech lending space has grown rapidly in recent years, but many lenders still rely on legacy systems and manual processes that limit efficiency and scalability. Kennek aims to leverage open banking and data integration to provide lenders with a more streamlined, automated lending experience.

The seed funding will allow the London-based startup to continue developing its platform and expanding its team to meet demand from non-bank lenders looking to digitize operations. Kennek’s focus on the UK and Europe also comes amid rising adoption of open banking and open finance in the regions.

Featured Image Credit: Photo from Kennek.io; Thank you!

Radek Zielinski

Radek Zielinski is an experienced technology and financial journalist with a passion for cybersecurity and futurology.

Continue Reading

Politics

Fortune 500’s race for generative AI breakthroughs

Published

on

Deanna Ritchie


As excitement around generative AI grows, Fortune 500 companies, including Goldman Sachs, are carefully examining the possible applications of this technology. A recent survey of U.S. executives indicated that 60% believe generative AI will substantially impact their businesses in the long term. However, they anticipate a one to two-year timeframe before implementing their initial solutions. This optimism stems from the potential of generative AI to revolutionize various aspects of businesses, from enhancing customer experiences to optimizing internal processes. In the short term, companies will likely focus on pilot projects and experimentation, gradually integrating generative AI into their operations as they witness its positive influence on efficiency and profitability.

Goldman Sachs’ Cautious Approach to Implementing Generative AI

In a recent interview, Goldman Sachs CIO Marco Argenti revealed that the firm has not yet implemented any generative AI use cases. Instead, the company focuses on experimentation and setting high standards before adopting the technology. Argenti recognized the desire for outcomes in areas like developer and operational efficiency but emphasized ensuring precision before putting experimental AI use cases into production.

According to Argenti, striking the right balance between driving innovation and maintaining accuracy is crucial for successfully integrating generative AI within the firm. Goldman Sachs intends to continue exploring this emerging technology’s potential benefits and applications while diligently assessing risks to ensure it meets the company’s stringent quality standards.

One possible application for Goldman Sachs is in software development, where the company has observed a 20-40% productivity increase during its trials. The goal is for 1,000 developers to utilize generative AI tools by year’s end. However, Argenti emphasized that a well-defined expectation of return on investment is necessary before fully integrating generative AI into production.

To achieve this, the company plans to implement a systematic and strategic approach to adopting generative AI, ensuring that it complements and enhances the skills of its developers. Additionally, Goldman Sachs intends to evaluate the long-term impact of generative AI on their software development processes and the overall quality of the applications being developed.

Goldman Sachs’ approach to AI implementation goes beyond merely executing models. The firm has created a platform encompassing technical, legal, and compliance assessments to filter out improper content and keep track of all interactions. This comprehensive system ensures seamless integration of artificial intelligence in operations while adhering to regulatory standards and maintaining client confidentiality. Moreover, the platform continuously improves and adapts its algorithms, allowing Goldman Sachs to stay at the forefront of technology and offer its clients the most efficient and secure services.

Featured Image Credit: Photo by Google DeepMind; Pexels; Thank you!

Deanna Ritchie

Managing Editor at ReadWrite

Deanna is the Managing Editor at ReadWrite. Previously she worked as the Editor in Chief for Startup Grind and has over 20+ years of experience in content management and content development.

Continue Reading

Politics

UK seizes web3 opportunity simplifying crypto regulations

Published

on

Deanna Ritchie


As Web3 companies increasingly consider leaving the United States due to regulatory ambiguity, the United Kingdom must simplify its cryptocurrency regulations to attract these businesses. The conservative think tank Policy Exchange recently released a report detailing ten suggestions for improving Web3 regulation in the country. Among the recommendations are reducing liability for token holders in decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) and encouraging the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) to adopt alternative Know Your Customer (KYC) methodologies, such as digital identities and blockchain analytics tools. These suggestions aim to position the UK as a hub for Web3 innovation and attract blockchain-based businesses looking for a more conducive regulatory environment.

Streamlining Cryptocurrency Regulations for Innovation

To make it easier for emerging Web3 companies to navigate existing legal frameworks and contribute to the UK’s digital economy growth, the government must streamline cryptocurrency regulations and adopt forward-looking approaches. By making the regulatory landscape clear and straightforward, the UK can create an environment that fosters innovation, growth, and competitiveness in the global fintech industry.

The Policy Exchange report also recommends not weakening self-hosted wallets or treating proof-of-stake (PoS) services as financial services. This approach aims to protect the fundamental principles of decentralization and user autonomy while strongly emphasizing security and regulatory compliance. By doing so, the UK can nurture an environment that encourages innovation and the continued growth of blockchain technology.

Despite recent strict measures by UK authorities, such as His Majesty’s Treasury and the FCA, toward the digital assets sector, the proposed changes in the Policy Exchange report strive to make the UK a more attractive location for Web3 enterprises. By adopting these suggestions, the UK can demonstrate its commitment to fostering innovation in the rapidly evolving blockchain and cryptocurrency industries while ensuring a robust and transparent regulatory environment.

The ongoing uncertainty surrounding cryptocurrency regulations in various countries has prompted Web3 companies to explore alternative jurisdictions with more precise legal frameworks. As the United States grapples with regulatory ambiguity, the United Kingdom can position itself as a hub for Web3 innovation by simplifying and streamlining its cryptocurrency regulations.

Featured Image Credit: Photo by Jonathan Borba; Pexels; Thank you!

Deanna Ritchie

Managing Editor at ReadWrite

Deanna is the Managing Editor at ReadWrite. Previously she worked as the Editor in Chief for Startup Grind and has over 20+ years of experience in content management and content development.

Continue Reading

Copyright © 2021 Seminole Press.